Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite McConnico v. Red Oak Timber Co., 847 So. 2d 191.

13 citing documents.

Robinson v. Nunly 69 So. 3d 631 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
3:4278.1 must be construed to mean "at least 80% of the ownership interest in the land.” McConnico v. Red Oak Timber Company, 36,985 (La.App.2d Cir.05/16/03), .
Sullivan v. Wallace 51 So. 3d 702 La. 2010
2 Cir. 5/16/03), , the court had applied La.
Alexander v. Dunn 15 So. 3d 302 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
However, as this court recognized in McConnico v. Red Oak Timber Co., 36,985 (La.App.2d Cir.5/16/03), fn.
Mary Guillory Willis, Et Ux. v. Cenla Timber, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
2 Cir. 5/16/03), : La.R.S.
Willis v. Cenla Timber, Inc. 3 So. 3d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
2 Cir. 5/16/03), , 195: La.R.S.
Distefano v. Berrytown Produce, LLC 973 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
App. 2nd Cir. 5/16/03), ; Otwell v. Diversified Timber Services, Inc., 2004-924, p. 9 (La.
Prewitt v. Rodrigues 893 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Maxine Hart Prewitt, Interdict v. Malcolm Rodrigues D/B/A Rodrigues & Son Logging La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Bessie L. Otwell v. Diversified Timber Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
2 Cir. 5/16/03), (emphasis added), after a detailed discussion of La.R.S.
Otwell v. Diversified Timber Services, Inc. 896 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
2 Cir. 5/16/03), (emphasis added), after a detailed discussion of La.R.S.
Cole-Gill v. Moore 862 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
As this court recognized in McConnico v. Red Oak Timber Co., 36,985 (La.App.2d Cir.05/16/03), : La.
Pender v. Elmore 855 So. 2d 930 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
McConnico v. Red Oak Timber Co., 36,985 (La.App.2d Cir.5/16/03), .
UNITED RENTALS HIGH. TECH. v. St. Paul Sur. 852 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
2 Cir. 5/16/03), ; Powell v. Dorris, 35,510 (La.