Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lee v. Schumpert, 836 So. 2d 1214.

21 citing documents.

  • Murphy v. Graphic Packaging, Inc. 112 So. 3d 1040 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    Morgan Chase v. Louis, 44,309 (La.App.2d Cir.5/13/09), ; Lee v. Schumpert, 36,733 (La.App.2d Cir.1/29/03), .
  • Kinchen v. City of Shreveport 73 So. 3d 1011 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Johnson, supra, citing Young v. Christus Schumpert Medical Center, 39,593 (La.App.2d Cir.5/11/05), ; Lee v. Schumpert, 36,733 (La.App.2d Cir.1/29/03), .
  • Dombrowski v. PATTERSON-UTI DRILLING COMPANY, LLC 63 So. 3d 308 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Young v. Christus Schumpert Medical Center, 39,593 (La.App.2d Cir.5/11/05), ; Lee v. Schumpert, 36,733 (La.App.2d Cir.1/29/03), .
  • City of Bossier City v. Colvin 36 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • Fortner v. GUIDE CORP. 27 So. 3d 1035 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Morgan Chase v. Louis, 44,309 (La.App.2d Cir.5/13/09), ; Lee v. Schumpert, 36,733 (La.App.2d14 Cir.1/29/03), .
  • Whatley v. NABORS DRILLING USA, LP 26 So. 3d 253 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Young v. Christus Schumpert Medical Center, 39,593 (La.App.2d Cir.5/11/05), ; Lee v. Schumpert, 36,733 (La.App.2d Cir.1/29/03), .
  • J.P. Morgan Chase v. Louis 12 So. 3d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    2 Cir. 1/29/03), , and citations therein.
  • Thomas v. Hollywood Casino 13 So. 3d 717 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • Johnson v. Bossier Parish School Board 3 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Young v. Christus Schumpert Medical Center, 39,593 (La.App.2d Cir.5/11/05), ; Lee v. Schumperi, 36,733 (La.App.2d Cir.1/29/03), .
  • Brien v. Leon Angel Constructors, Inc. 978 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • Jackson v. Red River Parish School Bd. 954 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    2d Cir.01/29/03), -21 , this court explained how a claimant must prove that she has an occupational disease: The claimant asserting an occupational disease must prove, by a preponderance of evidence, a disability related to an employment-related disease, that it was contracted during the course of employment, and that it is the re
  • Chassion v. Cingular Wireless 943 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    App. 2 Cir. 1/29/03), -21 (emphasis added) (citations omitted), the court described the burden of proof for a claimant asserting an occupational disease as follows: The claimant asserting an occupational disease must prove, by a preponderance of evidence, a disability related to an employment-related disease, that it was contracted du
  • Brenda Chaisson v. Cingular Wireless La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    We find that Dr. Mayeux’s testimony is similar to the testimony in Lee, that was found to sufficiently support a claim of epicondylitis and CTS as occupational diseases characteristic of and 2 Upon remand from the supreme court, the second circuit again ruled in favor of the employer in Fite v. Louisiana Title Co., 36,393 (La.App.
  • Taylor v. Hollywood Casino 935 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    App.2d Cir.01/29/03), -21 , this court described the burden of proof for a claimant asserting an occupational disease with the following language: The claimant asserting an occupational disease must prove, by a preponderance of evidence, a disability related to an employment-related disease, that it was contracted during the course of
  • Hammock v. Weyerhaeuser 917 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Young v. Christus Schumpert Medical Center, 39,593 (La.App.2d Cir.5/11/05), ; Lee v. Schumpert, 36,733 (La.App.2d Cir.1/29/03), .
  • Hays v. Western Refractory Construction, Inc. 903 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • Young v. Christus Schumpert Medical Center 902 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • Williams v. Mark Johnson Plumbing 882 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Lee v. Schumpert, 36,733 (La.App.2d Cir.1/29/03), .
  • Dowell v. Ochsner Clinic of Baton Rouge 874 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • Thomason v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 852 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Lee v. Schumpert, 36,733 (La.App.2d Cir.1/29/03), .
  • Jones v. General Motors Corp. 847 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    With regard to SEB, this court in Lee v. Schumpert, 36,733 (La.App.2d Cir.01/29/03), , explained: A claimant is entitled to receive supplemental earnings benefits if she sustains a work-related injury that results in her inability to earn 90% or more of her average pre-injury wage.