Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Robinson, 848 So. 2d 642.
-
State v. Ross
269 So. 3d 1052
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 2 Cir. 5/14/03), ], supra ; State v. Mason , (La.
- State v. Jackson 246 So. 3d 646 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
-
State v. Jackson
244 So. 3d 764
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
App. 2 Cir. 5/14/03), ; State v. Williams , 50,004 (La.
-
State v. Barron
243 So. 3d 1178
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
App. 2 Cir. 5/14/03), ; State v. Williams , 50,004 (La.
-
State v. Williams
178 So. 3d 1051
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Robinson, 37,043 (La.App.2d Cir.5/14/03), .
-
State v. Glover
106 So. 3d 129
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Linnear, supra; State v. Robinson, 37,043 (La.App.2d Cir.5/14/03), .
- State in the Interest of C.P. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
- State ex rel. C.P. 91 So. 3d 1273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
-
State v. Linnear
26 So. 3d 303
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Robinson, 37,043 (La.App.2d Cir.05/14/03), .
-
State v. Linnear
26 So. 3d 303
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Robinson, 37,043 (La.App.2d Cir.05/14/03), .
- State v. Ford 976 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
- State v. Kirkland 962 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
- State v. Tyner 953 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
-
State v. Qualls
921 So. 2d 226
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Robinson, 37,043 (La.App.2d Cir.5/14/03), , and citations therein.
-
State v. Sanders
900 So. 2d 221
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
2d Cir.5/14/03), , and citations therein.
-
State v. Richardson
896 So. 2d 257
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Robinson, 37,043 (La.App.2d Cir.05/14/03), .
-
State v. Bright
886 So. 2d 1183
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/98), ; State v. Robinson, 37,043 (La.App.2d Cir.5/14/03), .
-
State v. Updite
877 So. 2d 216
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
2 Cir. 5/14/03), , and citations therein.
-
State v. Cheatham
877 So. 2d 164
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
This court has most recently followed this ruling in State v. Robinson, 37,043 (La.App.2d Cir.5/14/03), , where we also noted that the defendant's burden of proving self-defense in a non-homicide case is by a preponderance of the evidence, not beyond a reasonable doubt.