Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mason, 862 So. 2d 1077.

18 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Joe Butler, Jr. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. Ronald Mark Leleaux, III La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
    App. 2 Cir. 12/10/03), citing State v. Bell, 03- 217 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Joseph Lee Smith La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
    App. 2 Cir. 12/10/03), (citing State v. Bell, 03-217 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Joseph Simpson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
    App. 2 Cir. 12/10/03), (citing State v. Bell, 03- 217 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Carlos M. Smith La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
  • State of Louisiana v. Emilio Taylor La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
  • State of Louisiana v. Jack D. Nobles La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
    App. 2 Cir. 12/10/03), this court stated that failure to inform a defendant of his rights during the habitual offender proceedings is error patent, but that under certain circumstances the error may be harmless.
  • State v. Lynn 251 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
    App. 2 Cir. 12/10/03), .
  • State v. Goosby 111 So. 3d 494 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Delaney, 42,990 (La.App.2d Cir.2/13/08), ; State v. Mason, 37,486 (La.App.2d Cir.12/10/03), .
  • State v. Robinson 79 So. 3d 1270 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Mason, 37,486 (La.App.2d Cir.12/10/03), .
  • State v. Holman 73 So. 3d 444 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Mason, 37,486 (La.App.2d Cir.12/10/03), .
  • State v. Robinson 63 So. 3d 1113 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    In State v. Mason, 37,486 (La.App.2d Cir.12/10/03), , this Court stated: La.
  • State v. Timmons 22 So. 3d 1074 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Mason, 37,486 (La.App.2d Cir.12/10/03), .
  • State v. Delaney 975 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    2 Cir. 12/10/03), , this court explained that failure to inform a defendant of his rights during the habitual offender proceedings is error patent, but that under certain circumstances the error may be harmless.
  • State v. Brown 966 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    2d Cir.12/10/03), , this court explained that failure to inform a defendant of his rights during the habitual offender proceedings is error patent, but that under certain circumstances the error may be harmless, stating: Before accepting a defendant's admission that he is a multiple offender, the trial judge must specifically advise th
  • State v. James 938 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Mason, 37,486 (La.App.2d Cir.12/10/03), , citing State v. Bell, 03-217 (La.App.
  • State v. Mason 908 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    2d Cir.12/10/03), (Drew and Peatross, Brown dissenting), reversed defendant’s adjudication and sentence because of an error in the habitual offender adjudication.
  • State v. Martin 913 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005