Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mason, 862 So. 2d 1077.
- State of Louisiana v. Joe Butler, Jr. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
-
State of Louisiana v. Ronald Mark Leleaux, III
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
App. 2 Cir. 12/10/03), citing State v. Bell, 03- 217 (La.
-
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Lee Smith
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
App. 2 Cir. 12/10/03), (citing State v. Bell, 03-217 (La.
-
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Simpson
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
App. 2 Cir. 12/10/03), (citing State v. Bell, 03- 217 (La.
- State of Louisiana v. Carlos M. Smith La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
- State of Louisiana v. Emilio Taylor La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
-
State of Louisiana v. Jack D. Nobles
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
App. 2 Cir. 12/10/03), this court stated that failure to inform a defendant of his rights during the habitual offender proceedings is error patent, but that under certain circumstances the error may be harmless.
-
State v. Lynn
251 So. 3d 1262
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
App. 2 Cir. 12/10/03), .
-
State v. Goosby
111 So. 3d 494
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Delaney, 42,990 (La.App.2d Cir.2/13/08), ; State v. Mason, 37,486 (La.App.2d Cir.12/10/03), .
-
State v. Robinson
79 So. 3d 1270
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Mason, 37,486 (La.App.2d Cir.12/10/03), .
-
State v. Holman
73 So. 3d 444
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Mason, 37,486 (La.App.2d Cir.12/10/03), .
-
State v. Robinson
63 So. 3d 1113
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
In State v. Mason, 37,486 (La.App.2d Cir.12/10/03), , this Court stated: La.
-
State v. Timmons
22 So. 3d 1074
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Mason, 37,486 (La.App.2d Cir.12/10/03), .
-
State v. Delaney
975 So. 2d 789
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
2 Cir. 12/10/03), , this court explained that failure to inform a defendant of his rights during the habitual offender proceedings is error patent, but that under certain circumstances the error may be harmless.
-
State v. Brown
966 So. 2d 727
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
2d Cir.12/10/03), , this court explained that failure to inform a defendant of his rights during the habitual offender proceedings is error patent, but that under certain circumstances the error may be harmless, stating: Before accepting a defendant's admission that he is a multiple offender, the trial judge must specifically advise th
-
State v. James
938 So. 2d 1191
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Mason, 37,486 (La.App.2d Cir.12/10/03), , citing State v. Bell, 03-217 (La.App.
-
State v. Mason
908 So. 2d 1250
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
2d Cir.12/10/03), (Drew and Peatross, Brown dissenting), reversed defendant’s adjudication and sentence because of an error in the habitual offender adjudication.
- State v. Martin 913 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005