Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Poche v. Frazier, 232 So. 2d 851.

58 citing documents.

Dolmo v. Williams 753 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
(4th Cir.1970) the Fourth Circuit succinctly stated: "Our law is well settled that when an innocent third party (such as the Dolmos) is injured as a result of a collision between two (or more) drivers, each of the drivers is deemed guilty of negligence per se and the burden of proof falls upon each to exculpate h
Billiot v. Estate of Richardson 655 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Carmen v. Gonzalez 637 So. 2d 1108 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Davis v. Kreutzer 633 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
application denied, 256 La.
McKenzie v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation 621 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
In Re Medical Review Panel Bilello 621 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Latiolais 613 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Durkee v. City of Shreveport 587 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Holliday v. United Services Auto. Ass'n 569 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Harris v. Hamilton 569 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Hargroder v. Protective Life Ins. Co. 556 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
871 , 872, (1971); (La.App.
Dowe v. Grady 540 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Highlands Ins. Co. v. Missouri Pacific RR Co. 532 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Snyder v. Taylor 523 So. 2d 1348 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
McGraw v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 519 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Bonner v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc. 494 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Boudreaux v. Murray 489 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Trentacoste v. Elmer 480 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Simon v. Smith 470 So. 2d 941 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Anthony v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 449 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Boothe v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 447 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Wilson v. Allstate Ins. Co. 446 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
In his reasons for judgment, the trial judge, (La.App.
Landry v. Bill Garrett Chevrolet, Inc. 443 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Veals v. Manis 437 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Confronted with this conflicting evidence in the first collision, (La.App.
Spears v. Aguilar 436 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Holmes v. Christopher 435 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Oshinski v. Central Nat. Ins. Co. of Omaha 432 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
In his reasons for judgment, (La.App.
Mathews v. Hanover Ins. Co. 428 So. 2d 1273 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Hoyt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 420 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Gaspard v. Breaux 413 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Holman v. Reliance Ins. Cos. 414 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Benoit v. Phillips Iron Works, Inc. 401 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
3rd Cir. 1967); (La.App.
Ainsworth v. State Farm Auto. Ins. Co. 399 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Jennings v. City of Alexandria 394 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Edwards v. Lewis Grocery Co. 391 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Littles v. Southeastern Fidelity Ins. Co. 398 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Sikes v. McLean Trucking Co. 383 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Rawls v. Damare 377 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
Smith v. Travelers Indem. Co. of Rhode Island 374 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Parker v. Travelers Ins. Co. 369 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Vitari v. Lewis 361 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Wilson v. Magee 359 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Jones v. Meinke 357 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
A second issue which must be resolved is the suit by plaintiff Joanne Jones, a passenger in the Allen vehicle, (La.App.
Skipworth v. McElroy Metal Mill, Inc. 353 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Postlewaite v. Morales 352 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Based upon his determination that the Morales and Jiminez testimony “can not be reconciled,” the trial court concluded that “(t)his (case) is another application of res ipsa loquitur to multiple defendants,” and American Security Ins.
Yeutter v. Lewis 334 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
1st Cir. 1973), writ refused (La.App.
Michel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 314 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Chandler v. Sun Ray Lighting Corp. 308 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Epperly v. Kerrigan 275 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
it cannot be said that there was an abuse of discretion by the trial court in his award to plaintiff.
Rogers v. Barton 264 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
We are mindful of the rule announced in Poche v. Frazier, La.App., , to the effect that after all litigants have rested, a trial court may not reopen a trial to take evidence of witnesses who were available and could have been produced on the first hearing.