Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Elledge v. Warren, 263 So. 2d 912.

59 citing documents.

Chesser v. Royal & Sunalliance Ins. Co. 926 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Hobbs v. Rhodes 667 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Sanner v. Zurich-American Ins. Co. 657 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Frois v. Bullock 639 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Ealy v. Hertz Corp. 630 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Art. 2050; (3rd Cir. 1972).
Sandoz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 620 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Higbee v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co. 617 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Fortier v. Hamblin 610 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Howell v. Balboa Ins. Co. 564 So. 2d 298 La. 1990
Brillo v. Hesse 560 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
The early history of the legislation adopting a (La.App.
Kerner v. Laballe 560 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
(3rd Cir.1972), writ denied, (4th Cir.1978); Baesler v. State Farm Mutual Auto.
McDaniel v. DeJean 556 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
App. 1st Cir.1982); (La.App.
Sharp v. Daigre 545 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Bauer v. White 532 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Vincent v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. 526 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
1 Cir.1974), writ refused (La.App.
Fisher v. Morrison 519 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Radar v. Duke Transp. Inc. 492 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Hastings v. International Service Ins. Co. 490 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Moncrief v. Panepinto 489 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Solice v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 488 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Glass Services Unlimited v. Modular Quarters, Inc. 478 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Percy v. Safeguard Ins. Co. 460 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Block v. Reliance Ins. Co. 433 So. 2d 1040 La. 1983
Smith v. Royal Globe Insurance 424 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Oncale v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 417 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Hebert v. Breaux 398 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
1 Cir. 1974), writ refused (La.App.
Branch v. O'BRIEN 396 So. 2d 1372 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
1st Cir. 1974), writ refused (La.App.
Earl v. Commercial U. Ins. Co. 391 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Bourgeois v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 385 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
1st Cir. 1974), writ denied ; (La.App.
Schmidt v. Estate of Choron 376 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Hickerson v. Protective National Insurance Co. of Omaha 375 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
521 , (1968) the intent of this act was said to be “to afford protection to the insured when they become the innocent victims of the negligence of uninsured motorists.” (La.App.
Carney v. American Fire & Indem. Co. 371 So. 2d 815 La. 1979
Redden v. Doe 357 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Robertson v. Cumis Ins. Co. 355 So. 2d 1371 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Griffin v. Armond 358 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Following Booth , which held that an exclusionary clause of the nature involved herein was void for violation of La.R.S.
Martin v. Phillips 356 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Phillips v. Barraza 349 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Hensley v. Government Emp. Ins. Co. 340 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
In discussing the reasons behind the uninsured motorist statute, (La.App.
Guillot v. Travelers Indem. Co. 338 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
This court was presented with a writ refused .
Thornton v. Moran 341 So. 2d 1136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
*1146 During the effective policy period, noted above, (3rd La.
Posey v. Commercial Union Insurance Company 332 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
2d 155 (La.App.3d Cir. 1973); writ refused 262 La.
Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 328 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
for general statements as to the purpose of the act and the rule that it should be liberally construed.
Nolker v. Wallace 317 So. 2d 4 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
1st Cir. 1974); (La.App.
Brister v. American Indemnity Company 313 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Appellant reasons that our decision in Thomas was "apparently" ( 3 La.App., 1972 ), Graham v. American Casualty Co., 261 La.
United Credit Plan of Jena, Inc. v. Hailey 311 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
for the proposition that the physical contact provisions do not contravene the recognized public policy in this state and are binding on the insured so that for such coverage to be applicable, physical contact must be made between the insured or the insured vehicle and the unidentified vehicle.
Hebert v. Green 311 So. 2d 223 La. 1975
writs refused ("the judgment is not final") 262 La.
Powell v. Hendon 308 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
Gremillion v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 302 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Such a holding would be contrary to the intention of the uninsured motorist statute, (La.App.
Doucet v. Insurance Company of North America 302 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
686 , (1972); , (La.App.
Wilkinson v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. 298 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Admittedly in Deane , Graham and Crenwelge, supra, (La.App.