Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Di Giovanni v. Cortinas, 44 So. 2d 818.

21 citing documents.

  • Debra A. Cloud v. Earl M. Gibson, Jr. and Chase Mortgage Company-West La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
    App. 4th Cir. 1965); (La.
  • Thomas v. Tobin 197 So. 3d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • Hamilton v. Royal Intern. Petroleum Corp. 934 So. 2d 25 La. 2006
    4 Cir.1966); , -821 (1950), cert.
  • Harris v. Estate of Fuller 532 So. 2d 1367 La. 1988
    DiGiovanni v. Cortinas, supra; [ , (1950)]; Bradford v. Patterson, 159 So.
  • Harris v. Estate of Fuller 521 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • Hines v. Dance 460 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    App. 2d Cir.1932); , (1950).
  • Securities Mortg. Co., Inc. v. Triplett 374 So. 2d 1226 La. 1979
  • Berry v. Captain 360 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    140 ; Spears v. Spears, supra.” , (1950) the Court stated: “In the case of Martin v. Serice, 200 La.
  • Jackson v. Hanna 206 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
    409 ; , ; and Thurmon v. Hogg, 225 La.
  • Bradford v. Patterson 159 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
  • Parquet v. Parquet 141 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1962
    Prampin v. Southern Chemical Works, La.App., ; , ; Westover Realty Co. v. State, 208 La.
  • Kirn v. Pierce 102 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
  • Staring v. Grace 97 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Plaintiffs urge the invalidity of the tax sale due to lack of notice to the true owners, , ; Gottlieb v. Babin, 197 La.
  • Esso Standard Oil Company v. Jordan 92 So. 2d 377 La. 1956
    409 ; , ; and Thurmon v. Hogg, 225 La.
  • Butler v. D'Antonio 91 So. 2d 345 La. 1956
  • Mayer v. Ozenne 87 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    distinguished among other reasons by the fact that the tax debtor had continuously been in corporeal possession o'f the land, which our jurisprudence has uniformly held prevents the running of the constitutional per-emptive period, , , see Fordham and Hunter, “Some Observations on the Louisiana Property Tax Collection System,” 7 La.
  • Robinson v. Mafrige 86 So. 2d 72 La. 1956
    163 , ; , ; and Thurmon v. Hogg, 225 La.
  • Ferrara v. Cortinas 76 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1955
    additional evidence might be introduced by the parties “concerning the amount of taxes due the defendant by the plaintiffs and the rents and revenues that may be due the plaintiffs from the defendant.” The Supreme Court also in its decree ordered that “upon determination of such amounts by the district court, * * * proper judgment be rendered regarding these claims.” , .
  • Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Marks 74 So. 2d 36 La. 1954
    409 ; , ; and Thurman v. Hogg, 225 La.
  • Carriere v. Dupre 72 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Act No. 170 of 1898, §§ 25, 50, 53; Const. 1921, art. 10, § 11.” , ; Federico v. Nunez, 173 La.
  • Doll v. Montgomery 58 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1952
    Schwing Lumber & Shingle Co., Inc., v. Board of Commissioners of Atchafalaya Basin Levee District, 202 La.