Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Adler v. Adler, 239 So. 2d 494.

36 citing documents.

Susana F. Moody v. Ross Moody La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Allen v. Allen 648 So. 2d 359 La. 1994
Bartholomew v. Bartholomew 593 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Pearce v. Pearce, supra; (La.App.
Dean v. Dean 579 So. 2d 1124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Wester v. Wester 564 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Jarman v. Jarman 540 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Gipson v. Gipson 536 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Cosentino v. Cosentino 521 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
at 1017 (La., 1978) the Louisiana Supreme Court, discussed the issue of fault: To constitute fault within the meaning of Article 160, the wife’s misconduct must not only be of a serious nature but must also be an independent contributory or proximate cause of the separation rather than a justifiable or natural response to initial fault on t
Penning v. Bouzon 524 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Suhren v. Suhren 505 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Zeringue v. Zeringue 479 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Derbes v. Derbes 462 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Lewis v. Lewis 446 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Jones v. Jones 442 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Slaughter v. Slaughter 436 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Hollins v. Hollins 428 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Holmgren v. Kaigle 425 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Rodrigue v. Rodrigue 424 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Perrilloux v. Perrilloux 424 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
817 ; Boudreaux v. Boudreaux, La.App., ; Brister v. Brister, La.App., ; Adler v. Adler, La.App., ; Davidson v. Jenkins, La.App., .
Boudreaux v. Boudreaux 407 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Lauro v. Lauro 399 So. 2d 1297 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Oliver v. Oliver 393 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Adams v. Adams 389 So. 2d 381 La. 1980
Short v. Fink 372 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
As this court observed in Adler v. Adler, La.App., , on the question of alimony under C.C.
Bruner v. Bruner 364 So. 2d 1015 La. 1978
LeBlanc v. LeBlanc 362 So. 2d 568 La. 1978
Pearce v. Pearce 348 So. 2d 75 La. 1977
Barrios v. Barrios 342 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
1032 , (1959); writ refused, 257 La.
Carter v. Carter 316 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Broussard v. Broussard 320 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Dowler v. Dowler 304 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
C. Art. 160, the wife is not entitled to permanent alimony after divorce unless she has not been at fault and the wife has the burden of proving her freedom from fault, (La.App.
Fulmer v. Fulmer 301 So. 2d 622 La. 1974
365 , (1950); certiorari denied, 257 La.
Whitt v. Vauthier 295 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
See Adler v. Adler, La.App., .
Smith v. Smith 287 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Kratzberg v. Kratzberg 286 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
this Court held that the following principles have emerged from the jurisprudence in this connection: "The wife is not deprived of alimony after divorce simply because she was not totally blameless in the marital discord.
Broussard v. Broussard 275 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by