Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Price, 899 So. 2d 633.
- State of Louisiana v. Ethan M. Doyle La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
- State of Louisiana v. Tristan Romero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
- State of Louisiana v. Douglas Scott Holley La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
- State of Louisiana v. Corday Treveil Taylor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
-
State of Louisiana v. William Shupp
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Price, 39,582 (La.App.2d Cir. 03/23/05)
-
State v. Shupp
185 So. 3d 900
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Price, 39,582 (La.App.2d Cir. 03/23/05), .
-
State v. Mitchell
163 So. 3d 858
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
The two tests used by Louisiana courts when examining double jeopardy violations are the “distinct fact’’ 7 Blockburger test and the “same evidence test.” 8 Under the Blockburger test; two offenses are not the same for purposes of double jeopardy if “each crime requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not.” State v. Price, 39,582 (La.App.2d Cir.3/23/05), ; State v. Barakat, 38,419 (La.App.2d Cir.6/23/04), .
-
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Sherman
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Price, 39,582 (La.App.2d Cir.03/23/05)
-
State v. Williams
54 So. 3d 1129
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Price, 39,582 (La.App.2d Cir.03/23/05), .
-
State v. Nelson
25 So. 3d 905
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
2d Cir.3/23/05), ; (La.App.
-
State v. Redfearn
22 So. 3d 1078
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
2 Cir. 3/23/05), ; (La.App.
-
State v. Smith
7 So. 3d 855
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
2d Cir.3/23/05), ; (La.App.
-
State v. Brown
966 So. 2d 727
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
2d Cir.3/23/05), ; (La.App.
- State v. Price 920 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006