DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gremillion v. Gremillion, 900 So. 2d 262.

16 citing documents.

  • Angela Fisher Sills Ashley v. Bryan Rhett Ashley La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
  • King v. King 247 So. 3d 973 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
    App. 2d Cir. 04/06/05), .
  • Welch v. Welch 244 So. 3d 581 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • Randall K. Tyler v. Joy Renee Hutchins Tyler La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    Evans, supra; Gremillion v. Gremillion, 39,588 (La.App.2d Cir.04/06/05)
  • Brown v. Brown 200 So. 3d 887 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    Evans, supra; Gremillion v. Gremillion, 39,588 (La.App.2d Cir.04/06/05), .
  • Darell Layne Cormier v. Tamatha Lynn Cormier, Born Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    2 Cir. 4/6/05), Accordingly, as the language of Article 112(B) is permissive and not mandatory, the trial court is not required to consider all of the factors listed therein.
  • Richards v. Richards 147 So. 3d 800 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Gremillion v. Gremillion, 39,588 (La.App.2d Cir.4/6/05), .
  • Evans v. Evans 145 So. 3d 1093 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Bickham, supra; Gremillion v. Gremillion, 39,588 (La.App.2d Cir.4/6/05), .
  • Shirley v. Shirley 127 So. 3d 935 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Jones v. Jones, 38,790 (La.App.2d Cir.6/25/04), , citing Bagwell v. Bagwell, 35,728 (La.App.2d Cir.3/08/02), ; McDermott v. McDermott, 32,014 (La.App.2d Cir.6/16/99), ; see also Gremillion v. Gremillion, 39,588 (La.App.2d Cir.4/06/05), .
  • Gisleson v. Deputy 122 So. 3d 1089 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • Eddie Rusk v. Delores Rusk La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    2 Cir. 4/6/05), (footnote omitted), the second circuit discussed the various considerations the trial court may take in determining the amount of spousal support, stating: [T]he basic tests for the amount of spousal support are the needs of that spouse and the ability of the other spouse to pay.
  • Rusk v. Rusk 102 So. 3d 193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    2 Cir. 4/6/05) , (footnote omitted), the second circuit discussed the various considerations the trial court may take in determining the amount of spousal support, stating: [T]he basic tests for the amount of spousal support are the needs of that spouse and the ability of the other spouse to pay.
  • Schmitt v. Schmitt 28 So. 3d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Prestenback v. Prestenback 9 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    2 Cir. 4/6/05), ; Knowles v. Knowles, 2002-331, p. 5 (La.
  • Dufresne v. Dufresne 992 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
  • Evans v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 968 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    *336 Gremillion v. Gremillion, 39,588 (La.App.2d Cir.4/6/05), .