DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ketchum v. Ketchum, 882 So. 2d 631.

16 citing documents.

  • Burns v. Burns 236 So. 3d 571 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    App. 2 Cir. 9/1/04), , 637 ; Shaw v. Shaw, 30,613 (La.
  • Tinsley v. Tinsley 211 So. 3d 405 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    App. 2nd Cir. 9/1/04), ; and Shaw v. Shaw, 30,613 (La.
  • Justin Hodges v. Amy Hodges 181 So. 3d 700 La. 2015
    2 Cir. 9/1/04), (“[W]e find no authority in the law for a designation of ‘co-domiciliary’ parents.”).
  • Theriot v. Theriot 177 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    2 Cir. 9/1/04), , in which the Second Circuit found that a father’s remarriage alone did not constitute a change in circumstances materially affecting the minor child’s welfare so as to warrant the change of custody ordered in that case.
  • Hodges v. Hodges 166 So. 3d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    2nd Cir.9/1/04), -639 (after the trial court modified the parties joint custodial arrangement from the mother being designated as the domiciliary parent to the parties being co-domiciliary parents, the court reversed the trial court’s modification of custody on the basis that the father failed to meet his requisite burden of proof
  • Distefano v. Distefano 169 So. 3d 437 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    2nd Cir.9/1/04), (noting there is "no authority in the law for a designation of 'co-domiciliary' parents”); Stewart v. Stewart, 2011-1334 (La.App.
  • Carolyn L. Moss v. George A. Goodger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • Moss v. Goodger 104 So. 3d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • Jennifer Stewart v. Harold G. Stewart La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    2 Cir. 9/1/04), (noting that there is “no authority in the law for a designation of „co-domiciliary‟ parents.”) Molony v. Harris, 10-1316, pp. 19-20 (La.App.
  • Stewart v. Stewart 86 So. 3d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    2 Cir. 9/1/04), (noting that there is “no authority in the law for a designation of ‘co-domiciliary’ parents.”) Molony v. Harris, 10-1316, pp. 19-20 (La.App.
  • Molony v. Harris 60 So. 3d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    2 Cir. 9/1/04), (noting that there is “no authority in the law for a designation of ‘co-domiciliary’ parents.”) The statute does permit the court to decline to designate a domiciliary parent if one of two exceptions applies: (1) a valid implementation order to the contrary must have been provided by the trial court, or (2) good
  • Harang v. Ponder 36 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Brantley v. Kaler 986 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    2 Cir. 9/1/04), , this court reversed a modified award that granted alternating-week custody.
  • Cook v. Cook 965 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • Colvin v. Colvin 914 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • Wages v. Wages 899 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    App.2d Cir.09/01/04), ; Pender v. Pender, 38,649 (La.App.2d Cir.05/12/04), .