Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite McCarty v. Trichel, 46 So. 2d 621.

26 citing documents.

Estate of Roderick Anderson Rick, Sr. . La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
Succession of Linda F. Enos La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
In Re Succession of Polk 940 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Succession of Juliette Bijou Polk La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
(3d Cir. 1961); (3d Cir. 1971).
Succession of Wright 376 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Succession of Zinsel 360 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Succession of Patterson 329 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
Cited in support of this principle of law were: , (1950).
Henry v. Blakesley 329 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Cited in support of this principle of law were: , (1950).
Succession of Smith 261 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Guidry v. Hardy 254 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
Woods v. Society for Propagation of Faith of Archdiocese of New Orleans, Inc. 251 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
8 , (1958); , (1950); Succession of Stafford, 191 La.
Succession of Chopin 214 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
8 , (1958); , (1950); Succession of Stafford, 191 La.
Succession of Papa 192 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
675 , ; , ; Succession of Talluto, widow of Spatafora, 239 La.
Succession of Bisso 186 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Followed Succession of Gaudin 140 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
1055, 1062 ; , .” Accordingly, we reaffirm our decision in the , and hold that extrinsic evidence may be properly admitted to prove the certainty of the date of an olographic will.
Condon v. McCormick 134 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
(and cases cited therein.)
Succession of Bradford 130 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Succession of Franz, supra; Succession of Pizzati, supra; , The true test of testamentary capacity is whether, at the time of making a will, the testatrix is of sufficient mind to understand the nature of the testamentary acts and appreciate their effects, or the ability to comprehend the condition of her property and her relation to those who may naturally expe
Succession of Vicknair 126 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
Succession of Holland 106 So. 2d 697 La. 1958
750 , ; , ; Succession of Pizzati, 218 La.
Succession of Franz 94 So. 2d 270 La. 1957
Succession of Roth 94 So. 2d 270 La. 1957
Succession of Moody 80 So. 2d 93 La. 1955
a case in which the testatrix did have paresis, the true test of testamentary capacity is whether at the time of making the will the testator is of sufficient mind to understand the nature of the testamentary acts and appreciate their effects.
Lebleu v. Manning 74 So. 2d 384 La. 1954
72 ; , ; Succession of Pizzati, 218 La.
Succession of Prejean 71 So. 2d 328 La. 1954
That is the true test.” ■, In the . , , this Court .stated: “Multiple: cases have reached this Court involving the question of testamentary capacity and it has been in rare instances only — where the evidence of insanity was positive and overwhelming — that the wills were an- .
Succession of Pizzati 50 So. 2d 189 La. 1950
Gregory v. Hardwick 49 So. 2d 423 La. 1950