Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wier v. Glassell, 44 So. 2d 882.

22 citing documents.

Glassell Producing Co. v. Naquin 224 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
887-888 (1950); Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Guillory, 212 La.
H&E Equipment Services, Inc. v. Sugar & Power International, LLC 215 So. 3d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
(1950); Bossier Parish School Board, 161 So.3d at 1009 .
Bossier Parish School Board v. Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc. 161 So. 3d 1007 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
(1950); Commercial Nat’l Bank v. Rowe, 27,800 (La.App.
Clk Company, LLC v. Cxy Energy, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Nexen argues that the supreme court’s So.2d 882 (1950), requires a different conclusion.
CLK COMPANY, LLC v. CXY Energy, Inc. 972 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
(1950), requires a different conclusion.
McKee v. Hayward 710 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Duncan v. Paragon Resources, Inc. 417 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Acadian Production Corp. v. Tennant, 222 La.
Bown v. AUSTRAL OIL CO., INC. 322 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Wurzlow v. Placid Oil Company 279 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
(1950) which defines an overriding royalty interest as a mere `appendage' of the lease and Reagan v. Murphy, 235 La.
Sklar Producing Co. v. Rushing 262 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Fontenot v. Sun Oil Company 243 So. 2d 783 La. 1971
721 , ; , ; and Arkansas Fuel Oil Company v. Gary, 227 La.
Fontenot v. Sun Oil Co. 240 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
that the termination of a lease extinguishes an overriding royalty carved from that lease as an appendage to it.
Robichaux v. Pool 209 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
3 , ; Acadian Production Corp. v. Tennant, 222 La.
McDonald v. O'Meara 139 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Wier v. *287 Glassell, , 216 La.
Prestridge v. Humble Oil & Refining Company 131 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
415 , ; Mier [Wier] v. Glassell, , ; Broussard, et al. v. Hassie Hunt Trust, 231 La.
Castille v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance 92 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
699 , , and Northwestern Mut.
Grayson v. Lyons, Prentiss & McCord 76 So. 2d 531 La. 1954
Arkansas Fuel Oil Co. v. Gary 70 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
It cannot have a life of its own, any more than could interest exist apart from the note or debt to which it is attached.” See also Wier v. Glassell, 1950, , 888 .
Serio v. Chadwick 66 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
In Wier v. Glassell, 1950, , 886 , plaintiff sought to have himself recognized as the owner of a 1/16th over-riding royalty on certain tracts of land.
Sterbcow v. Peres 64 So. 2d 195 La. 1953
Ascher v. Midstates Oil Corp. 64 So. 2d 182 La. 1953
the court, in passing upon a like overriding royalty, observing: “ * * * Stated in another form it may be asked: Does the existence of such an overriding royalty depend upon the existence of the lease itself to which it is attached and consequently expires with the termination of that .
Bond v. Midstates Oil Corp. 53 So. 2d 149 La. 1951
in which it was definitely held that the retention of an overriding royalty by the lessee in a transfer made by him had the effect of constituting such transfer a sublease, notwithstanding the fact that the contract was denominated as an assignment.