Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Arnold v. Arnold, 46 So. 2d 298.
-
Piper v. Central Louisiana Electric Co.
542 So. 2d 7
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
We conclude on the basis of Arnold, v. Arnold, , (1950), that our inadvertent failure to formally dismiss Evangeline’s appeal could not serve to breathe life into an order of appeal which was absolutely null.
-
Bentley v. Bentley
433 So. 2d 837
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
973 , ; Clements v. Kimble, La.App., , and failure to timely post the required appeal bond, , ; Moon v. Moon, La.App., .
- Guilliot v. City of Kenner 326 So. 2d 359 La. 1976
-
Swan v. Clover Farm Creamery, Inc.
311 So. 2d 285
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
569 , (1967); , (1950); and Fidelity Bank & Trust Co. of Slidell v. Pinewood Country Club, Inc., (1st La.App., 1971).
- Malone v. Malone 282 So. 2d 119 La. 1973
-
Great American Insurance Companies v. East
264 So. 2d 761
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
2d 700 ; , ; Fisher v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, etc., 218 La.
-
Malone v. Malone
265 So. 2d 255
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
State Through Dept. of Highways v. Nevils [La.App.], ; Loftin v. Knost [La.App.], ; Dupre v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. [La.App.], .” In this case, we are faced with an appeal from a judgment of the Lower Court rejecting petitioners suit for termina
- David v. Department of Public Safety 261 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
-
Shuff v. Wright
258 So. 2d 690
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
City of Baton Rouge v. Kiper, La.App., .
-
In re Investigation of Possible Violation of the Civil Service Law & Rules by Roberts
257 So. 2d 473
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
973 , ; Clements v. Kimble, La.App., , and failure to timely post the required appeal bond, , ; Moon v. Moon, La.App., .
-
Williams v. White
256 So. 2d 350
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
(1950), the Supreme Court of this State made it quite clear that “the appellate court does not acquire jurisdiction of appeals which have not been taken and perfected by the filing of bond within the prescribed time and that it is the duty of the court to dismiss such appeals ex pro-prio motu.” Therefor
-
Dounson v. Faia
246 So. 2d 729
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
915 , (1942); , (1950); * * *” Accordingly, for the above and foregoing reasons, appellee’s motion is granted and this appeal is hereby dismissed at appellant’s costs.
-
Smith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
239 So. 2d 738
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
915 , ; , ; Fisher v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, etc., 218 La.
-
Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Guarisco Enterprises, Inc.
234 So. 2d 469
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
915 , ; , ; Fisher v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, etc., 218 La.
-
Moon v. Moon
232 So. 2d 838
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
915 , ; , ; Fisher v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, etc., *840 218 La.
-
Williams v. Williams
227 So. 2d 752
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Article 3942; , ; Dore v. Leblanc, La.App., .
-
Sims v. Louisiana Private Schools, Inc.
223 So. 2d 187
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
915 , ; , ; Fisher v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, etc., 218 La.
-
Castille v. Castille
221 So. 2d 834
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Dupre v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., .
-
Manderfield v. Manderfield
221 So. 2d 898
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
State Through the Department of Highways v. Nevils, La.App., ; Loftin v. ICnost, La.App., ; Dupre v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, La.App., .
-
LaRose v. LaRose
211 So. 2d 95
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
915 , ; , ; Fisher v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, etc., 218 La.
-
Aetna Insurance Co. v. Robinson
199 So. 2d 369
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
915 , ; , ; Fisher v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, etc., 218 La.
-
Bulk Transport, Inc. v. General Truck Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers Local Union No. 5
195 So. 2d 159
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
The jurisprudence of this Court, as reaffirmed in the later cases, namely, Arnold v. Arnold [ , ] and Thompson v. Bamburg [ 231 La.
-
McCrory v. Link Belt Co.
195 So. 2d 172
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
915 , ; , ; Fisher v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, etc., 218 La.
-
Orrell v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance
180 So. 2d 710
La. 1965
915 , ; , ; Fisher v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, etc., 218 La.
-
Armant v. Miljak
118 So. 2d 516
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Dickerson v. Hudson, 201 La.
-
Kotteman v. Grevemberg
96 So. 2d 604
La. 1957
915 , ; , and Thompson v. Bamburg, 231 La.
-
City of Baton Rouge v. Kiper
96 So. 2d 241
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Citing such cases, and dismissing an appeal as “absolutely null” where both order and bond were subsequent to the year permitted under Article 593, C.P., for devolu- *243 tive appeals, , , our Supreme Court stated that “the appellate court does not acquire jurisdiction of appeals which have not been taken and perfected by the filing of bond within the prescribed time”, .
- Thompson v. Bamburg 93 So. 2d 666 La. 1957
-
Schouest v. Loewenthal
58 So. 2d 425
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
243 , ; , ; Dickerson v. Hudson, 201 La.