Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Arnold v. Arnold, 46 So. 2d 298.

29 citing documents.

  • Piper v. Central Louisiana Electric Co. 542 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    We conclude on the basis of Arnold, v. Arnold, , (1950), that our inadvertent failure to formally dismiss Evangeline’s appeal could not serve to breathe life into an order of appeal which was absolutely null.
  • Bentley v. Bentley 433 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    973 , ; Clements v. Kimble, La.App., , and failure to timely post the required appeal bond, , ; Moon v. Moon, La.App., .
  • Guilliot v. City of Kenner 326 So. 2d 359 La. 1976
  • Swan v. Clover Farm Creamery, Inc. 311 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    569 , (1967); , (1950); and Fidelity Bank & Trust Co. of Slidell v. Pinewood Country Club, Inc., (1st La.App., 1971).
  • Malone v. Malone 282 So. 2d 119 La. 1973
  • Great American Insurance Companies v. East 264 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    2d 700 ; , ; Fisher v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, etc., 218 La.
  • Malone v. Malone 265 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    State Through Dept. of Highways v. Nevils [La.App.], ; Loftin v. Knost [La.App.], ; Dupre v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. [La.App.], .” In this case, we are faced with an appeal from a judgment of the Lower Court rejecting petitioners suit for termina
  • David v. Department of Public Safety 261 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
  • Shuff v. Wright 258 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    City of Baton Rouge v. Kiper, La.App., .
  • In re Investigation of Possible Violation of the Civil Service Law & Rules by Roberts 257 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    973 , ; Clements v. Kimble, La.App., , and failure to timely post the required appeal bond, , ; Moon v. Moon, La.App., .
  • Williams v. White 256 So. 2d 350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    (1950), the Supreme Court of this State made it quite clear that “the appellate court does not acquire jurisdiction of appeals which have not been taken and perfected by the filing of bond within the prescribed time and that it is the duty of the court to dismiss such appeals ex pro-prio motu.” Therefor
  • Dounson v. Faia 246 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    915 , (1942); , (1950); * * *” Accordingly, for the above and foregoing reasons, appellee’s motion is granted and this appeal is hereby dismissed at appellant’s costs.
  • Smith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 239 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    915 , ; , ; Fisher v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, etc., 218 La.
  • Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Guarisco Enterprises, Inc. 234 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    915 , ; , ; Fisher v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, etc., 218 La.
  • Moon v. Moon 232 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    915 , ; , ; Fisher v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, etc., *840 218 La.
  • Williams v. Williams 227 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    Article 3942; , ; Dore v. Leblanc, La.App., .
  • Sims v. Louisiana Private Schools, Inc. 223 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    915 , ; , ; Fisher v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, etc., 218 La.
  • Castille v. Castille 221 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    Dupre v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., .
  • Manderfield v. Manderfield 221 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    State Through the Department of Highways v. Nevils, La.App., ; Loftin v. ICnost, La.App., ; Dupre v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, La.App., .
  • LaRose v. LaRose 211 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    915 , ; , ; Fisher v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, etc., 218 La.
  • Aetna Insurance Co. v. Robinson 199 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    915 , ; , ; Fisher v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, etc., 218 La.
  • Bulk Transport, Inc. v. General Truck Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers Local Union No. 5 195 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    The jurisprudence of this Court, as reaffirmed in the later cases, namely, Arnold v. Arnold [ , ] and Thompson v. Bamburg [ 231 La.
  • McCrory v. Link Belt Co. 195 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    915 , ; , ; Fisher v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, etc., 218 La.
  • Orrell v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 180 So. 2d 710 La. 1965
    915 , ; , ; Fisher v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, etc., 218 La.
  • Armant v. Miljak 118 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    Dickerson v. Hudson, 201 La.
  • Kotteman v. Grevemberg 96 So. 2d 604 La. 1957
    915 , ; , and Thompson v. Bamburg, 231 La.
  • City of Baton Rouge v. Kiper 96 So. 2d 241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Citing such cases, and dismissing an appeal as “absolutely null” where both order and bond were subsequent to the year permitted under Article 593, C.P., for devolu- *243 tive appeals, , , our Supreme Court stated that “the appellate court does not acquire jurisdiction of appeals which have not been taken and perfected by the filing of bond within the prescribed time”, .
  • Thompson v. Bamburg 93 So. 2d 666 La. 1957
  • Schouest v. Loewenthal 58 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    243 , ; , ; Dickerson v. Hudson, 201 La.