Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Fields v. General Casualty Co. of America, 45 So. 2d 85.

21 citing documents.

Robbins v. Caraway-Rhodes Veterinary Hospital 315 So. 2d 688 La. 1975
(2) In holding the plaintiff’s employment non-hazardous and thus not covered by the compensation act, , (1950), some dicta in our Fontenot decision cited above, and upon numerous court of appeal decisions, most of which were decided during the 1930’s. These decisions are based upon an interpretation of La.R.S.
Robbins v. Caraway-Rhodes Veterinary Hospital 299 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
(1950), plaintiff was employed as a laborer in a retail feed-and-seed business.
Doss v. American Ventures, Inc. 261 So. 2d 615 La. 1972
(Emphasis ours) , (1950), where, in a footnote, we observed that: "1.
Fontenot v. J. Weingarten, Inc. 232 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Ponthieux v. Lindsay 226 So. 2d 482 La. 1969
where we again cited the Shipp case and observed in a footnote that "It is well settled that it is the nature of the employer's business and not the particular work done by the employee which is the determinative factor in suits for compensation."
Ponthieux v. Lindsay 226 So. 2d 482 La. 1969
where we again cited the Shipp case and observed in a footnote that “It is well settled that it is the nature of the employer’s business and not the particular work done by the employee which is the determinative factor in suits for compensation.” (Italics ours) Innumerable decisions of the various Cou
Loewer v. Duplechin 161 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
54:58 defines “warehouseman” as follows: “(11) ‘Warehouseman’ means a person lawfully engaged in the business of storing goods for profit.” , , our Supreme Court said: “ * * * The storing of goods on property for purposes of sale and distribution does not constitute the operation of a warehouse.
Edwards v. Stafford 153 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Honeycutt v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 146 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
822 ; Scott v. Dalton Company, Inc. (La.App., 1 Cir., 1941), ; Goodman v. National Casualty Company (La.App., 1 Cir., 1943), ; Wells v. Morgan & Lindsey, Inc. (La.App., 1 Cir., 1949), ; Fields v.. General Casualty Company of America, , ; Harrington v. Franklin’s Stores Corporation of New Iberia (La.App., 1 Cir., 1951), .
Allen v. Travelers Insurance Co. 124 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
McMorris v. Home Indemnity Insurance Company 107 So. 2d 645 La. 1958
McMorris v. Home Indemnity Co. 94 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
23:-1204 and the following cases: , 45 So.
Carpenter v. Madden 90 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
486 ; , ; Prater v. Sun Indemnity Co. of New York, La.App., .
Kline v. Dawson 89 So. 2d 385 La. 1956
428 ; Franz v. Sun Indemnity Company of New York, La.App., , .
Freeman v. Clark 88 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
1949, ; Fields v. General Casualty Company of America, La.App.1948, , affirmed , ; Livingston v. Henry & Hall, La.App.
Hammer v. Lazarone 87 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
the defendant’s insured owned and operated a feed and seed store.
Rogers v. Weldon 85 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Co., , ; Foret v. Paul Zibilich Co. [ 18 La.App.
Coleman v. Sears, Roebuck & Company 83 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
Co. of America, , ; Harrington v. Franklin's Stores Corp. of New Iberia, La.App., .
Smith v. Crossett Lumber Co. 72 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
See also Fields v. General Casualty Co. of America, La.App., , affirmed by the Supreme Court in , ; Prater v. Sun Indemnity Co. of New York, La.App., .
Cannon v. Michigan Mut. Liability Co. 66 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
23:1204 states; “Neither the furnishing of medical services nor payments by the employer or his insurance carrier shall constitute an admission of liability for compensation under this Chapter.” , .
Harrington v. Franklin's Stores Corp. of New Iberia 55 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951