Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lama v. Manale, 50 So. 2d 15.

22 citing documents.

Claitor v. Delahoussaye 858 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
(1950), where the supreme court upheld a liquidated damages provision for five times the rent per day for every day the lessee failed to surrender possession.
Philippi v. Viguerie 606 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
(1950); Hemenway Company, Inc. v. Bartex, Inc. of Texas, (La.App.
McKay v. Prevost 563 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Hebert v. Hebert 535 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Lama v. Manale, [ ], (1950); (La.App.
Matherne v. Rise 479 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Hebert v. Neyrey 432 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Baber v. Hoffer 430 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Carter's Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Franklin 428 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
McClelland v. Security Indus. Ins. Co. 426 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Ball Marketing, Inc. v. Sooner Refining Co. 422 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
50 * (1950); Hemenway Company, Inc. v. Bartex, Inc. oí Texas, (La.App.
Louisiana Sav. Ass'n v. Trahan 415 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
14 (1870); , (1950); (La.App.
Haymon v. Holliday 405 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
737 *1309 (1932); , (1950), 23 A.L.R.2d 1312 ; (La.App.
Klumpp v. Colonial Pipeline Co. 389 So. 2d 457 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
The court bases its decision on the following jurisprudence: , , (La.
Hemenway Co., Inc. v. Bartex, Inc. of Texas 373 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Scoggin v. Bagley 368 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
Maloney v. Oak Builders, Inc., 256 La.
HIBERNIA NAT. BANK IN NEW ORLEANS v. Lee 344 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
Edmonston v. A-SECOND MORTGAGE CO. OF SLIDELL, INC. 273 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
our Supreme Court said: "Where there is a clause in a contract, and that clause is the agreement of the parties, the defense of a lack of knowledge of its existence is untenable.
Lanier v. Trans-World Life Insurance 258 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
953 , (1964); , (1951); LSA-Civil Code Article 1945.
Maloney v. Oak Builders, Inc. 235 So. 2d 386 La. 1970
“It is a fixed rule of law that where the parties have the capacity to stipulate for liquidated damages, and when agreed upon, courts will not inquire whether the actual damage suffered equaled or approximated the agreed amount.” , .
Giamanco v. Fairbanks 230 So. 2d 65 La. 1969
3.’ , , 23 A.L.R.2d 1312 .
Harry Bourg Corp. v. Union Producing Co. 197 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
In Lama v. Manale (1951) , , 23 A.L.R.2d 1312 , we find the following pronouncement for the interpretation of a contract: "[1,2] Where there is a clause in a contract, and that clause is the agreement of the parties, the defense of a lack of knowledge of its existence is untenable.
Texaco, Inc. v. Vermilion Parish School Board 152 So. 2d 541 La. 1963
3.” , , 23 A.L.R.2d 1312 .