Mahan v. Michel
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., October 19, 1972 265 So. 2d 821; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., December 10, 1954 77 So. 2d 131; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., July 6, 1970 237 So. 2d 727; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., February 26, 1931 133 So. 512; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., April 20, 1906 3 Teiss. 304
Mahan v. Michel, 27 La. 96 (1875).
Opinion text
Howell, J. The defendant, Michel, has appealed from a judgment against him for a portion of the claim of plaintiff. The latter has *97 asked for an amendment of the judgment, allowing him the whole amount claimed, and for damages for a frivolous appeal. An examination of the record satisfies us that the judge a quo did not err. When an appellee asks for an amendment of the judgment, he will not be allowed damages. 6 R. 450 ; 8 An. 73. Judgment affirmed.