DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wainwright v. Wainwright, 46 So. 2d 902.

24 citing documents.

  • McGovern v. Tatman 410 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    950 , ; , ; that the right to receive such alimony in a lump sum is not waived by plaintiff’s failure to make periodic demands on the defendant, Gehrkin v. Gehrkin, supra; and that liability cannot be avoided by simply claiming that the alimony was not due, since a reduction of alimony or a discharge from the obl
  • Vernon v. Leger 363 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    950 , ; , ; that the right to receive such alimony in a lump sum is not waived by plaintiff’s failure to make periodic demands on the defendant, Gehrkin v. Gehrkin, supra; and that liability cannot be avoided by simply claiming that the alimony was not due, since a reduction of alimony or a discharge from the obl
  • Compton v. Bertaut 359 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
  • Smith v. Smith 357 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    (1950), wherein attorney fees were disallowed in a suit to recover accrued alimony and to increase the amount of future alimony.
  • Sutterfield v. Sutterfield 354 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    Thereafter, however, , (1950), the court denied the wife’s demand for attorney’s fees in a case involving past due alimony.
  • Halcomb v. Halcomb 352 So. 2d 1013 La. 1977
    950 , ; , ; that the right to receive such alimony in a lump sum is not waived by plaintiff's failure to make periodic demands on the defendant, Gehrkin v. Gehrkin, supra ; and that liability cannot be avoided by simply claiming that the alimony was not due, since a reduction of alimony or a discharge from the ob
  • Champagne v. Champagne 345 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    3 Cir.1976); , (1950); Newson v. Newson, 176 La.
  • Stanfield v. Stanfield 342 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
    (1950), involved an action to increase a previously awarded alimony judgment and to accrue unpaid alimony.
  • Baldwin v. Baldwin 337 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    473 (1933); , (1950); and, writs denied 246 La.
  • Janise v. Janise 328 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    However, , (1950), that Court, without discussing the prior Newson case, denied the mother's claim for attorney's fees with the statement: "We know of no law and have been referred to none which provides for such fees in a case of this kind."
  • Gauthreaux v. Gauthreaux 315 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    The trial judge herein, however, , (1950), which refused to allow attorney's fees to a wife for her prosecution of an action to recover accrued alimony (for maintenance and support of herself and minor children born of the marriage) and to have future alimony payments increased subsequent to divorce.
  • Cortes v. Fleming 307 So. 2d 611 La. 1974
    862 , (1954); , (1950); Gehrkin v. Gehrkin, 216 La.
  • Rodriguez v. Rodriguez 245 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
    App., ; De La Bretonne v. De La Bretonne, La.App., ; , .
  • Bell v. Bell 225 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
    Dupuis v. Patin, La.App., ; Dunham v. Dunham, La.App., ; De La Bretonne v. De La Bretonne, La.App., ; , .
  • Coleman v. Coleman 209 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
    950 , ; , ; that the right to receive such alimony in a lump sum is not waived by plaintiff's failure to make periodic demands on the defendant, Gehrkin v. Gehrkin, supra; and that liability cannot be avoided by simply claiming that the alimony was not due, since a reduction of alimony or a discharge from the obl
  • Elchinger v. Elchinger 181 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
    Dupuis v. Patin, La.App., ; Dunham v. Dunham, La.App., ; De La Bretonne v. De La Bretonne, La.App., ; , 46 So.
  • Stoltz v. Stoltz 162 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
    is directly in point on the question presently under consideration.
  • De La Bretonne v. De La Bretonne 164 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
  • Dunham v. Dunham 162 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    950 ], ; and Wainwright v. Wainwright, [ ] .
  • Dupuis v. Patin 155 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    950 , ; , ; that the right to receive such alimony in a lump sum is not waived by plaintiff's failure to make periodic demands on the defendant, Gehrkin v. Gehrkin, supra; and that liability cannot be avoided by simply claiming that the alimony was not due, since a reduction of alimony or a discharge from the obl
  • Duncan v. Roane 127 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    Article 548 and the cases of Wainwright v. Wainwright, 1950, , , and Lodatto v. Lodatto, 1959, 238 La.
  • Succession of Nock 119 So. 2d 476 La. 1960
  • Pisciotto v. Crucia 71 So. 2d 226 La. 1954
    950 , ; , ; that the right to receive such alimony in a lump sum is not waived by plaintiff’s failure to make periodic demands on the defendant, Gehrkin v. Gehrkin, supra; and that liability cannot be avoided by simply claiming that the alimony was not due, since a reduction of alimony or a discharge from the obl
  • Wainwright v. Wainwright 60 So. 2d 410 La. 1952
    The judgment was affirmed insofar as it fixed the future alimony at $125 per month , .