DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Guilbeaux v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company, 134 So. 2d 717.

15 citing documents.

  • Granger v. Ford, Bacon & Davis Construction Corp. 448 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • Walton v. Town of Jena 284 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    3rd Cir. 1967) [ (La.App.
  • Serean v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation 277 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
    Delafosse v. Industrial Painters, Inc., []."
  • Dodd v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 269 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    Guilbeaux v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company, La.App., ; Lewis v. Celotex Corp., La.App., ; Clark v. Glenwood Hospital, La.App., .
  • Mitchell v. Eunice Country Club, Inc. 226 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    3d Cir.1969); Jenkinson v. Clemons, supra.
  • Guillory v. American Fire & Casualty Co. 192 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    3rd Cir. 1965); (La.App.
  • Wilturner v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. 177 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    3 Cir., ; and Gisevius v. Jackson Brewing Company, et al, La.App.
  • Allen v. George W. McCoy & Co. 176 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    Porche v. Reliable Battery Company, supra; (La.App.
  • Shelton v. Arnett 175 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    Jenkinson v. Clemons, La.App., ; Guilbeaux v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company, La.App., ; Card v. Southern Builders, Inc., La.App., ; and Fouchea v. Maloney Trucking & Storage Inc., La.App., .” In the instant case, there are no corroborating circumstances, and the plaintiff’s unsupported testimony has been discredited as reasoned supra.
  • Brister v. Great American Insurance 171 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    But, as was pointed out in Garrett v. Gaylord *770 Container Corp., : “ * * * This is subject to the further condition that there is nothing to discredit the plaintiff’s account of the accident and the resulting disability and his statements are supported by the surrounding circumstances.” See also Guilbeaux v. Trinity Universal Insurance Co., La.App., (3 Cir.1961); Franks v. Department of Highways for Louisiana, La.App., ; O’Connor v. American Automobile Insurance Co., La.App., .
  • Scardina v. Ward 159 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Without quoting the opinion but citing same with full approval, the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, with Judge Frugé as the organ of the Court, in Guilbeaux v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company, La.App., , made an exhaustive and complete review of the Louisiana Courts’ holdings and therein delineated the basis on which the uncorroborated testimony of an employee is insufficient to warrant judgment in his favor in a workmen’s compensation case.
  • Vaughn v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 159 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Jenkinson v. Clemons, La.App., ; Guilbeaux v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company, La.App., ; Card v. Southern Builders, Inc., La.App., ; and Fouchea v. Maloney Trucking & Storage Inc., La.App., .
  • Porche v. Reliable Battery Co. 145 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Co., La.App., and Guilbeaux v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company, La.App., .
  • Jenkinson v. Clemons 144 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    This rule is treated in great detail in Guilbeaux v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company, La.App., .
  • Cloud v. National Surety Corp. 138 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Gilbeaux v. Trinity Universal Insurance Co., La.App., (2nd Cir.App.1961); Water v. L. L. Brewton Lumber Co., La.App., (2nd Cir.App.1960) and the many cases cited therein; Malone’s Louisiana Workmen’s Compensation Law and Practice, Sec.