DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Fellows v. Fellows, 267 So. 2d 572.

40 citing documents.

  • Guillot v. Munn 756 So. 2d 290 La. 2000
    App. 2 Cir.1973); (La.App.
  • Grigsby v. Grigsby 573 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • Osborne v. Osborne 512 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • In re Arend 504 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    This rule is based upon the principle that “children are thus entitled by birthright to a life during their minority harmonious with the father’s station.” (La.App.
  • Palmer v. Palmer 476 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    767 , (1959) and of our own holdings in Lewis v. Lewis, supra, Worley v. Worley, supra, (La.App.
  • Clooney v. Clooney 446 So. 2d 981 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • Garcia v. Garcia 438 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
  • Milligan v. Milligan 431 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Davis v. Davis 428 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
  • Morris v. Morris 426 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    Defendant also cites a related line of cases, (La.App.
  • Lynch v. Lynch 422 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
  • Goux v. Goux 408 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Courville v. Courville 401 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
  • Lewis v. Lewis 395 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    In the Bow-sky case the alimony awarded pendente lite was not only for the support of the wife but for the support of a minor son.” (La.App.
  • Coulon v. Coulon 389 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    As stated in Fellows v. Fellows, La.App., : “...
  • Landeche v. Airhart 372 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
  • Neel v. Neel 365 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
  • Suire v. Miller 363 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
  • Bowman v. Bowman 355 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
    3rd Cir. 1971); (La.App.
  • George v. George 347 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    3rd Cir. 1971); (La.App.
  • Dubois v. Breaux 341 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
  • Ducote v. Ducote 339 So. 2d 835 La. 1976
    App., (1972); Pettitt v. Pettitt, La.App., (1972).
  • Ducote v. Ducote 331 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
  • Nelson v. Nelson 335 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
  • Gravel v. Gravel 331 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
  • Tobin v. Tobin 323 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
  • Grishman v. Grishman 322 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
  • Broussard v. Menard 316 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
  • Mertens v. Mertens 308 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
  • Webster v. Webster 308 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
  • Hughes v. Hughes 303 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    rehearing denied, the court said: "Under our jurisprudence, alimony pendente lite, both for the wife and minor children terminates with a judgment of divorce.
  • Manuel v. Broderson 298 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    3rd Cir. 1971); (La.App.
  • Griffith v. Griffith 286 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    [4] In this connection, see Dubroc v. Dubroc, No. 5808 of our docket, handed down November 2, 1973, ; Fellows v. Fellows, La.App., .
  • Eaglin v. Eaglin 306 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
  • Wood v. Wood 289 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    Fellows v. Fellows, La.App., .
  • Kratzberg v. Kratzberg 286 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
    Art. 37 as amended effectively on July 26, 1972, by Act 98 of 1972
  • Dubroc v. Dubroc 284 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
    [4] Fellows v. Fellows, La.App., .
  • Moreland v. Moreland 279 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    1st Cir. 1972) ; (La.App.
  • Jackson v. Jackson 275 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
  • Hargrove v. Hargrove 272 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
    Fellows v. Fellows, La.App., (3d Cir. 1972); Steiner v. Steiner, La.App.