DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Overby v. Beach, 55 So. 2d 873.

16 citing documents.

  • Ferace v. Fullerton 425 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    Sylvester v. Town of Ville Platte, supra; , (1951); American Creosote Company v. Springer, 257 La.
  • Smith v. Cupples Real Estate, Inc. 412 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
  • Slagle v. Morgan 410 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
  • Dambre v. Fair 376 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    in which the excepting French Market Homestead was dismissed from the suit on exception of no cause of action where the decree of rescission was sought by the party who placed the loan upon the property.
  • Lambert v. Cavalier 338 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    1845; 1 Overby v. Bench, 1951, , ; Note, 1952, 12 La.L.Rev.
  • Nugent v. Stanley 336 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
  • Musser v. Copping 325 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    (S.Ct.1951); Nicol v. Jacoby, 157 La.
  • Cryer v. M & M Manufacturing Company, Inc. 273 So. 2d 818 La. 1973
    848 , (1954); , (1951); and Pan American Production Co. v. Robichaux, 200 La.
  • Cryer v. M & M Manufacturing Co. 253 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    (1951) and Schmitz v. Peterson, 113 La.
  • Feinhals v. Campbell 145 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    where a Building Loan Association was sought to be made an unwilling defendant in a suit to rescind a sale for fraud, on rehearing the Supreme Court held that the Homestead Association was neither an indispensable nor necessary party to the suit.
  • Van Vracken v. Harry J. Spiro, Inc. 139 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
  • Russell v. Bartlett 139 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
    wherein the defense to an action for rescission due to fraud or error was that the defendant was not plaintiff's vendor but the homestead was.
  • Clark v. Reed 122 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
    Nielsen v. Planters Trust & Savings Bank of Opelousas, 183 La.
  • La Croix v. Recknagel 89 So. 2d 363 La. 1956
    * * * ” See, also, , and authorities cited therein.
  • Smith v. Le Sueur & Co. 79 So. 2d 501 La. 1955
    Under a similar set of facts this Court, , , in its opinion on rehearing, arrived at the conclusion that such contract could not be enforced because the legal collectible rentals were misrepresented.
  • Breaux v. Laird 65 So. 2d 907 La. 1953
    358 , ; , ; C. W. Greeson Co. v. Harnischfeger Corp., 219 La.