DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Roy O. Martin Lumber Co. v. Sinclair, 56 So. 2d 240.

18 citing documents.

  • Redar, LLC v. Warren D. Rush La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    Rush cites Roy O. Martin Lumber Co., for the proposition that as an officer of the court, an attorney may not be awarded an expert witness fee for testifying about the proper compensation of another attorney.
  • Redar, LLC v. Warren Rush La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    Rush cites Roy O. Martin Lumber Co., for the proposition that as an officer of the court, an attorney may not be awarded an expert witness fee for testifying about the proper compensation of another attorney.
  • Redar, LLC v. Warren D. Rush La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    Rush cites Roy O. Martin Lumber Co., for the proposition that as an officer of the court, an attorney may not be awarded an expert witness fee for testifying about the proper compensation of another attorney.
  • REDAR, LLC v. Rush 51 So. 3d 859 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    (1951), for the proposition that as an officer of the court, an attorney may not be awarded an expert witness fee for testifying about the proper compensation of another attorney.
  • Montz v. Theard 818 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    [4] Roy O. Martin Lumber Co., , (1951) (sale of a tractor, three motors, two mules and two trailers); Byrd v. Cooper, 166 La.
  • Hewitt v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana 787 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
  • State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Williamson 585 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    (1951), attorneys are not entitled to an expert witness fee when testifying about the value of legal services.
  • Varacalle v. Turner 556 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    In re Wallace Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., 469 F.2d 396 (5th Cir.1972); , (1951); (La.App.
  • Holley v. Singletary 464 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • Haymon v. Holliday 405 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Matter of Succession of Dunham 408 So. 2d 888 La. 1981
    In re Wallace Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., 469 F.2d 396 (5th Cir. 1972); , (1951); Givens v. Southern *897 Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co., (La.App.
  • Griffin v. Pitre 278 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
  • Parnell v. Baham 228 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
    (1951), and Givens v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins.
  • Nugent v. Downs 230 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
    *602 , (1951), our Supreme Court held that attorneys are officers of the court and that when they are present in court and called to testify as to the value of services rendered by another attorney, expert witness fees cannot be allowed to those attorneys.
  • Givens v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 197 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1967
    (1951); Remington Rand v. Boliew (La.App.)
  • Tolbird v. Cooper 136 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    See Roy O. Martin Lumber Company, , , and the many cases cited therein.
  • Remington Rand v. Boliew 131 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    193 ; Roy O. Martin Lumber Co. v. Sinclair, 1951, , .
  • Bedsole v. Lee 78 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    The District Court as shown by its written reasons substantially based its entire judgment upon such a , , in which the Supreme Court said in part: "The judgment of the lower court dissolving the sequestration is correct.