Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite City of Shreveport v. Abe Meyer Corp., 52 So. 2d 445.

51 citing documents.

St. Bernard Port v. Violet Dock Port, Inc. 255 So. 3d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
447 (1951), affirmed as amended , 223 La.
State of La., Thru Dotd v. Paul Henry Wagner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
An assessment of damages in an expropriation case must include consideration of the most profitable use to which the land can be put “by reason of its location, topography, and adaptability.” So.2d 445, 447 (1951).
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Wagner 25 So. 3d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
An assessment of damages in an expropriation case must include consideration of the most profitable use to which the land can be put “by reason of its location, topography, and adaptability.” , (1951).
Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Hill 788 So. 2d 1154 La. 2001
(1951), affirmed as amended, 223 La.
Exxon Pipeline Co. v. LeBlanc 763 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
amended and affirmed, 223 La.
Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Hill 763 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
(1951), amended and affirmed, 223 La.
Southwestern Elec. Power Co. v. Scurlock 485 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
amended and affirmed, 223 La.
State, Dept. of Highways v. Terrace Land Co., Inc. 298 So. 2d 859 La. 1974
The chief decisions of this court relied upon by the Department are: , (1951) (remanded) and 223 La.
City of New Orleans v. Cloutet 296 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
[5] , ; State, Department of Highways v. Talbot, La.App., .
Lafayette Airport Commission v. Roy 265 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Wolfe 252 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
This would be a departure from the established rule that the measure of value of property expropriated for public use is market value at the time of the taking, i. e., the price which could be agreed upon by a willing seller and a willing buyer under normal circumstances, , (1951); State Through Department of Highways v. Jenkins, La.App., ; and State Through Department of Highways v. Mouledous, La.App., 200 So.
Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Dixon 201 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1967
Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. Edward J. Gay Planting & Manufacturing Co. 200 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Co. v. Harang, La.App., ; , ; ; Central La.
Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Ristroph 200 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
See City of Shreveport v. Abe Meyer Corp., 1951, , ; State, Through Department of Highways v. Madden, La.App., 2nd Cir. 1962, ; Central Louisiana Electric Co. v. Mire, La.App., 1st Cir. 1962, ; State, Through Department of Highways v. Carlina, La.App., 1st Cir. 1964, .
Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Greenwald 188 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
784 , (1944); , (1951); Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Simmons, 229 La.
Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. Roy 198 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
784 , (1944); , (1951); Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Simmons, 229 La.
State, Sabine River Authority v. Salter 184 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
and authorities cited therein.
Central Louisiana Electric Company v. Dunbar 183 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Louisiana Power and Light Company v. De Bouchel, La.App., .
City of Monroe v. Nastasi 175 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
It is well-established that the highest and best use to which the property is adapted must be taken into account; , ; Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. Simmons, 229 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Treat 163 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
It is quite true, , that in condemnation cases the fixing of market value should be considered with relation to the most profitable use to which the land can be put with respect to location, topography and adaptability.
State v. Brooks 152 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1963
657 , ; , ; Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Simmons, 229 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Olivier 145 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1962
657 , ; , ; Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Brinkmann, 224 La.
Louisiana Power and Light Company v. BOUCHEL 143 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
201 , 78 So.(2d) 833; , 52 So.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Hayward 142 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Bundy 143 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
657 , ; , ; Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Brinkmann, 224 La.
Trunkline Gas Co. v. Cassidy 138 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
* * * * * * “ , , has been departed from herein, as counsel for defendant contend.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Madden 139 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
448-(1951), that evidence elicited in an expro-- *23 priation case is not to be restricted to testimony showing market value for all purposes, but “the inquiry extends to any and all evidence which might be of aid to the court in determining the true value provided for in Article 2633.” The court elab
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Atkinson 135 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
State v. Hedwig, Inc. 133 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
is what a prospective purchaser for subdivision purposes would have been willing to pay for the property.
State v. Gras 131 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
State v. Crockett 131 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
165 , ; , ; Louisville & N. R. Co. v. R. E. E. De Montluzin Co., 166 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Pace 131 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
262 , ; , ; Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. Morehouse Realty Co., La.App.2d Cir., 1961, ; LSA-C.C.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. McNeely 130 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
657 , ; , ; Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Brinkmann, 224 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Barnard 130 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
However, we do not regard the pronouncements in the case above cited as detracting from or minimizing the correlated and equally well-established principle that the most profitable use to which land can be put by reason of its location, topography and adaptability will be considered in condemnation cases as bearing upon its market value; , ; Koerber v. City of New Orleans, 234 La.
St. Bernard Parish School Board v. Carolyn Park, Inc. 131 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
City of Shreveport v. Abe Meyer Corp., 1951, , .
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Varino 129 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
165 , ; City of Shreveport v. Abe Meyer Corporation, 1951, , .
Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. Tricou 128 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
L[ouisville] & N Railroad Co. v. R. E. E. De Montluzin Co., 166 La.
Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. Morehouse Realty Co. 126 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
854 ; , ; Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Simmons, 229 La.
Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. Ponder 127 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Louisville & N. Railroad Co. v. R. E. E. De Montluzin Company, 166 La.
State v. Rownd 119 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1960
In the first place, we realize that in establishing a , , 447: "* * * Article 2633 of the Civil Code, in speaking of true value, contemplates, of course, that the criterion to be used in expropriation proceedings in arriving at the basis for assessment is market valuethat is, the price which would be agreed upon at a voluntary sale between a willing seller
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Havard 118 So. 2d 131 La. 1960
657 , ; , ; Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Brinkmann, 224 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Esnard 117 So. 2d 52 La. 1960
657 , ; , ; Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Brinkmann, 224 La.
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Mortallaro 101 So. 2d 450 La. 1958
657 , ; , ; Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Brinkmann, 224 La.
Koerber v. City of New Orleans 100 So. 2d 461 La. 1958
is the test for determining the value of property taken under the power of eminent domain.
STATE, DEPT. OF HWYS. v. Sauls 99 So. 2d 97 La. 1958
262 , ; , ; Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Persson, 203 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Ragusa 99 So. 2d 20 La. 1958
657 , ; , ; Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Brinkmann, 224 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Sauls 99 So. 2d 97 La. 1958
262 , ; , ; Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Persson, 203 La.
Lafayette Parish Through the Police Jury v. Hernandez 93 So. 2d 672 La. 1957
854 ; , , and numerous authorities therein cited.” It is conceded that the most profitable use to which this land could be put by reason of its location, topography, and adaptability is that of a subdivision, and this fact should be considered in determining its market value.
Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Simmons 85 So. 2d 251 La. 1956
854 ; , , and numerous authorities therein cited.
Caddo Parish School Board v. Willer 78 So. 2d 833 La. 1955
*208 , , has been departed from herein, as counsel for defendant contend.