Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gulf Shipside Storage Corporation v. Thames, 46 So. 2d 62.

14 citing documents.

Clark v. BOARD OF COM'RS, ETC. 422 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
State, Dept. of Hwys. v. Lamar Adv. Co. of La., Inc. 304 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Our jurisprudence is established that this constitutional provision applies to all statutes except those in which a different effective date is expressly stated, or where the provisions of the statute clearly imply that a different effective date was intended by the Legislature, , (1960); (La.App.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Salemi 185 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
City of Crowley v. Prejean 173 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
Curet v. Hiern, La.App.Orl., (building code violation).
Cox v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board 165 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
We believe the Supreme Court of Louisiana, with Justice McCaleb as the organ of that court, definitely and positively settled this question in Gulf Shipside Storage Corpo *675 , at page 66, and we quote: “Finally, counsel contend that the court below erred in casting defendant for plaintiff’s costs.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Latil 137 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
345 , ; , .” In the case of East Baton Rouge Parish School Board v. Ford, La.App., , we used the following reasons given in the Westwego Canal Company case, supra, to allow a defendant to recover his expert appraisers costs, which we quote : “To hold that the owner must pay his own costs in resisting a
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Jones 138 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
345 , ; , .” (Emphasis supplied).
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Hart 137 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
345 , ; , .” We feel that the judge of the lower court in his written reasons for judgment covered this entire case satisfactorily.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Guidry 109 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
345 , ; , .” For the above and foregoing reasons, we conclude that the State of Louisiana could and should not acquire in these proceedings the full ownership of the property in question inclusive of the minerals for the following reasons: 1.
Curet v. Hiern 95 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1957
Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co., 211 La.
East Baton Rouge Parish School Board v. Ford 76 So. 2d 20 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
STATE, DEPT. OF HWYS. v. Barineau 72 So. 2d 869 La. 1954
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Barineau 72 So. 2d 869 La. 1954
State ex rel. Bonnabel Land Co. v. Board of Com'rs 69 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1954
13:-4521, , ; Tuggle v. Police Jury of Webster Parish, La.App., ; McCrary v. Police Jury of Caddo Parish, La.App., ; McGee v. Police Jury of Caddo Parish, La.App., ; Goodwin v. Department of Highways, La.App., ; see, also, Opinions of Attorney General, 1940-42, p.