DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jarrell v. Travelers Ins. Co., 50 So. 2d 22.

25 citing documents.

  • Alexander v. Reed 350 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    (1950) (3rd Cir. 1974), writ refused La.
  • Farris v. Ducote 293 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    (1950), an employee working only one day a week is entitled to be paid compensation computed on the basis of a six day working week.
  • Venable v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 142 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Co., , , we attempted to straighten out apparent difficulties and clarify our former decisions.
  • Shuff v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 134 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    Co., , , we attempted to straighten out apparent difficulties and clarify our former decisions.
  • Doucet v. Ashy Construction Co. 134 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    the Supreme Court said that the weekly wages of a workman employed under the compensation act should be computed on the basis of a six-day working week.
  • Stewart ex rel. Stewart v. Johnston 127 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Co., , ; Carrington v. Consolidated Underwriters, 230 La.
  • Hoffman v. City of New Orleans 125 So. 2d 774 La. 1961
    412 ; , (where the employee worked under a contract of hiring for one day a week) ; Troquille v. Lacaze’s Estate et al., 222 La.
  • Fontenot v. Travelers Insurance Company 125 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
    Co., 1950, , ; and Rylander v. T. Smith & Son, 1933, 177 La.
  • Miller v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America 121 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    Jarrell v. Travelers Insurance Company, 1951, , ; Carrington v. Consolidated Underwriters, 1956, 230 La.
  • Hoffman v. City of New Orleans 121 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    Co., , ; Carrington v. Consolidated Underwriters, 230 La.
  • Pope v. Coney 119 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    the Supreme Court of this state, with the Honorable John B. Fournet as the organ of the court, held that to determine an employee's weekly earnings for purposes of fixing compensation due, the daily rate of pay must be multiplied by six (the greatest number of days an employee can work).
  • Fourcade v. Ryan Stevedoring Co. 117 So. 2d 587 La. 1960
    Co., , ; Carrington v. Consolidated Underwriters, 230 La.
  • Varnell v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co. 113 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    Jarrell v. Travelers Insurance Company, 1951, , ; Carrington v. Consolidated Underwriters, 1956, 230 La.
  • Sepulvado v. Argonaut Underwriters Insurance Co. 111 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    412 ; Jarrell v. Travelers Insurance Company, 1950, , ; Troquille v. Lacaze’s Estate, 1953, 222 La.
  • Neldare v. Schuylkill Products Co. 107 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    Co., , , as follows: “(A)n injured workman is entitled to compensation at the rate of pay in effect on the actual day of the injury, based not upon the number of days per week he was employed but upon the number of days he could possibly have secured employment had he not been injured, or six days a week.”
  • Guillory v. Coal Operators Casualty Company 95 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
  • Davis v. Reynolds 96 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
    Co., , ; Carrington v. Consolidated Underwriters, 230 La.
  • Carrington v. Consolidated Underwriters 89 So. 2d 399 La. 1956
    In reviewing some of the decisions thus cited in support of our conclusion in the *403 , , as follows: "In the case of Rylander v. T. Smith & Son, Inc., 177 La.
  • Clifton v. Arnold 87 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Co., , ; Gibbs v. Pizzolato, La.App.
  • Evans v. Louisiana State Board of Education 85 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    the injured em *674 ployee worked only one day a week, at a wage of $3 for the day worked.
  • Martin v. Great American Indemnity Co. 75 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    and followed by us in Moore v. Aysen, La.App., .
  • Moore v. Aysen 69 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    Co., , , where the Supreme Court, through Chief Justice Fournet, said: “In the case of Rylander v. T. Smith & Son, Inc., 177 La.
  • Troquille v. Lacaze's Estate 63 So. 2d 139 La. 1953
  • Schum v. Marion T. Fannaly, Inc. 59 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
  • Fisher v. Williams Lumber Co. 51 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951