DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canal Realty & Improvement Co. v. Pailet, 46 So. 2d 303.

20 citing documents.

  • Dung Pham v. Carey Gix La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
  • 501 Rue Decatur, L.L.C. v. VTM Properties, LLC 141 So. 3d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    (1950), which held that the acceptance of rent after notice of eviction by the landlord, “constituted a waiver of that notice and a forgiveness as to any and all previously committed infractions, and it served to reinstate the lease as of that time.” A & J, Inc., 02-259, p. 7, 831 So.2d at 316 .
  • Kingfish Development, LLC v. Press It 1 New Orleans, LLC 135 So. 3d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4th Cir.1969); Canal Realty & , (1950).
  • Claitor v. Delahoussaye 858 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • Karno v. Joseph Fein Caterer, Inc. 846 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    1955); Canal Realty & Improvement Co., , (1950); Adam, Inc. v. Dividend, Inc., (La.App.
  • A & J, INC. v. Ackel Real Estate, LLC 831 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    App. 5th Cir.1987) p 179 -385 , (1950), the acceptance of rent after notice of eviction vitiates the notice.
  • Bowling U.S.A., Inc. v. Genco 536 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Canal Realty & , (1950); (La.App.
  • Thompson v. Avenue of Americas Corp. 499 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    App. 4th Cir.1974), indicate that the acceptance of the May rent did vitiate the demand for May and June rent, even more persuasive is the language in Canal Realty & Improvement Co., , (1950), quoted in Arms v. Rodriguez, 232 La.
  • Adam, Inc. v. Dividend, Inc. 447 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    4th Cir.1974), indicate that the acceptance of the May rent did vitiate the demand for May and June rent, even more persuasive is the language in Canal Realty & Improvement Co., , (1950), quoted in Arms v. Rodriguez, 232 La.
  • Ernst Food Mart, Inc. v. Jackson-Atlantic Inc. 405 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    4th Cir. 1969); Canal Realty & So.2d 303 (1950); (La.App.
  • Cuoco v. Pik-A-Pak Grocery Corp. 379 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
    381 , (1955); Canal Realty and Improvement Co., , (1950); Arms v. Rodriguez, 232 La.
  • Flores v. Gondolier, Ltd. 375 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    4 Cir. 1974); Canal Realty & , (1950); Four Seasons, Inc. v. New Orleans Silversmiths, Inc., (La.App.
  • Mitchell v. V-6 Co. 372 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    In Canal Realty & , (1950), the Supreme Court held that a May 19 notice ordering lessee to vacate by May 31 was waived and the default was forgiven when lessor accepted the June rent.
  • Illinois Cent. Gulf R. Co. v. International Harvester 368 So. 2d 1009 La. 1979
    951 , (1957); Canal Realty & , (1950); Trichel v. Donovan, 138 La.
  • West End Landing, Inc. v. Board of Levee Com'rs 299 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
  • Major v. Hall 251 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
  • Landis v. Smith 227 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    In the case of Canal Realty & , , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the landlord’s acceptance of past due rent was a waiver of a previous notice cancelling a lease for a breach of lease conditions.
  • Four Seasons, Inc. v. New Orleans Silversmiths, Inc. 223 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
  • Staples v. Rush 113 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    Cited as authority for his position, are: Canal Realty & Improvement Company, Inc. v. Pailet, 1950, , , and Arms v. Rodriguez, 1957, 232 La.
  • Arms v. Rodriguez 95 So. 2d 616 La. 1957
    3 The defendant contends that the action of the plaintiff in accepting rental payments for the months of April and May subsequent to the notice of violation alleged to have been given by letter of March 21st constituted a waiver of the notice, and as a consequence this action was premature, citing Canal Realty & Improvement Co., Inc., v. Pailet, , .