DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bond v. Midstates Oil Corp., 53 So. 2d 149.

18 citing documents.

  • Hoover Tree Farm, L.L.C. v. Goodrich Petroleum Co. 63 So. 3d 159 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    336 (1940); , (1951); Noel Estate, Inc. v. Murray, 223 La.
  • Pinnacle Operating Co. v. ETTCO ENTERPRISES 914 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • Willis v. International Oil & Gas Corp. 541 So. 2d 332 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    (1951); Smith v. Sun Oil Co., 165 La.
  • Serio v. Stewart Investments, Inc. 427 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    "* * * that the distinction between an assignment on the one hand and a sublease *694 on the other is that in an assignment the original lessee transfers all of his rights in the lease; whereas in a sublease he retains some control or interest in it."
  • Andrus v. Kahao 414 So. 2d 1199 La. 1982
  • Estate of Whitley v. Anning 392 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    923 , (1953); , (1951); Roberson v. Pioneer Gas Co., 173 La.
  • Hankamer v. Texaco, Inc. 387 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Cameron Meadows Land Co. v. Bullard 348 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    46 (1931); , (1951); Prestridge v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., Broussard v. Hassie Hunt Trust, 231 La.
  • Scurlock Oil Company v. Getty Oil Company 278 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
    474 , (1956); , (1951); Prestridge v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., (La.App.
  • Thriftee Oil Co. v. Partin 209 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    “* * * that the distinction between an assignment on the one hand and a sublease on the other is that in an assignment the original lessee transfers all of his rights in the lease; whereas in a sublease he retains some control or interest in it”.
  • Adams v. Grigsby 152 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1963
    (Citing authorities) The above pronouncement was re-enunciated by the opinion in Bond, et al. v. Mid-States Oil Corp., et al., , , which approved the above quotation from the Roberson case as being sound and judicious advice.
  • Prestridge v. Humble Oil & Refining Company 131 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    173 , ; , ; Mier [Wier] v. Glassell, 216 La.
  • Broussard v. Hassie Hunt Trust 91 So. 2d 762 La. 1956
    An assignment has been differentiated from a sublease by this Court on many occasions, the distinction being that “ * * * in an assignment the original lessee transfers all of his rights in the lease; whereas in a sublease he retains some control or interest in it.” , .
  • Berman v. Brown 70 So. 2d 433 La. 1953
  • Noel Estate, Inc. v. Murray 65 So. 2d 886 La. 1953
  • J. F. Auderer Laboratories, Inc. v. Deas 67 So. 2d 179 La. 1953
    “ * * * that the distinction between an assignment on the one hand and a sublease on the other is that in an assignment the original lessee transfers all of his rights in the lease; whereas in a sublease he retains some control or interest in it”.
  • Ascher v. Midstates Oil Corp. 64 So. 2d 182 La. 1953
    173 , and Bond v. Midstates Oil Corporation, 1951, , .
  • Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Nesbitt 63 So. 2d 417 La. 1953
    and Baker v. Potter, 223 La.