Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ohlhausen v. Sternberg Dredging Co., 50 So. 2d 803.
-
Robert J. Lejeune v. Bell Tower Corporation
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
In reaching this holding, So.2d 803 (1951), in which the supreme court held, under similar facts, that the determinative factor was the existence of a definitive agreement between the parties prior to the employee’s departure from Louisiana for employment in Florida.
-
LeJEUNE v. BELL TOWER CORP.
34 So. 3d 464
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In reaching this holding, , (1951), in which the supreme court held, under similar facts, that the determinative factor was the existence of a definitive agreement between the parties prior to the employee’s departure from Louisiana for employment in Florida.
-
Petticrew v. Abacus Capital Corp.
974 So. 2d 692
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
reversed on other grounds, ; Harvey v. B E & K Construction, 30,825 (La.App.
-
Baldwin v. North American Energy Services
970 So. 2d 101
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
2 Cir. 8/19/98), , , (1951), in which the supreme court held that the determining factor that an employment contract was entered into in Louisiana was the existence of a definitive agreement prior to the plaintiff leaving his home in Louisiana and traveling to another state where a job awaited him.
-
Gary Baldwin v. North American Energy Services
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
2 Cir. 8/19/98), So.2d 803 (1951), in which the supreme court held that the determining factor that an employment contract was entered into in Louisiana was the existence of a definitive agreement prior to the plaintiff leaving his home in Louisiana and traveling to another state where a job awaited him.
-
Harvey v. BE & K CONST.
716 So. 2d 514
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
(1951); reversed on other grounds
- Bolton v. Tulane University of Louisiana 692 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
-
Jepsen v. B-Con Const. Co., Inc.
475 So. 2d 112
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
(1951), to support their argument that the decedent was working under a Louisiana contract of *115 hire.
-
Wilson v. Gulf Ins. Co.
431 So. 2d 1095
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
(1951) the plaintiff wrote to his former employer from Louisiana and asked to have his old job back whereupon the employer, a Delaware corporation, responded that if Ohlhausen were to come to Florida, he would be reinstated.
-
Thompson v. Teledyne Movible Offshore, Inc.
419 So. 2d 822
La. 1982
175 (La.App.Orl.1940) at 178-79 in its decision, , (1951): Although there is no express stipulation contained in the statute to the effect that it shall have extra-territorial jurisdiction, it has been consistently held by our courts that, if the contract of employment is made within this State, the law will apply even though the employee was injured in
-
Ryder v. Insurance Company of North America
282 So. 2d 771
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
540 , (1965); Ohlhausen v. Sternberg Dredging Company, et al., , (1951).
-
Welch v. Travelers Insurance Company
225 So. 2d 623
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
690 ; McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., supra, and Hunt v. Magnolia Petroleum Company, La.App., ; , (1951).
- Mattel v. Pittman Construction Company 180 So. 2d 696 La. 1965
-
Crooks v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.
175 So. 2d 875
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
Williams v. Travelers Insurance Co., La.App.
-
Mattel v. Pittman Construction Co.
174 So. 2d 141
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
(1951); Selser v. Bragmans Bluff Lumber Co., 146 So.
-
Babineaux v. Southeastern Drilling Corporation
170 So. 2d 518
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
For instance, he departed from Louisiana for overseas employment as a result of an offer made to him here in Louisiana, , 50 So.
- Woodham v. Travelers Insurance Company 161 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
-
Brooks v. Griggs Casing Crews, Inc.
136 So. 2d 693
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
1044 ; , ; Hargis v. McWilliams Co., 9 La.App.
-
Reed v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance
83 So. 2d 660
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
: , , wherein the contract of employment was held to bé' a Louisiana contract, and, ‘therefore, under the provisions' of:the Louisiana Workmen’s Compensation Laws.- In' that case, the petitioner wrote defendant in Florida arid asked for his old job back.
- Cobb v. International Paper Company 76 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
-
Ohlhausen v. Sternberg Dredging Co.
53 So. 2d 206
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
The Supreme Court granted a writ of cer-tiorari and, in an opinion dated January 9, 1951, , , reversed the judgment of this court, holding that the Louisiana Workmen’s Compensation Act did apply and remanded the case to us for a consideration of the merits.