Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ohlhausen v. Sternberg Dredging Co., 50 So. 2d 803.

21 citing documents.

  • Robert J. Lejeune v. Bell Tower Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    In reaching this holding, So.2d 803 (1951), in which the supreme court held, under similar facts, that the determinative factor was the existence of a definitive agreement between the parties prior to the employee’s departure from Louisiana for employment in Florida.
  • LeJEUNE v. BELL TOWER CORP. 34 So. 3d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    In reaching this holding, , (1951), in which the supreme court held, under similar facts, that the determinative factor was the existence of a definitive agreement between the parties prior to the employee’s departure from Louisiana for employment in Florida.
  • Petticrew v. Abacus Capital Corp. 974 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    reversed on other grounds, ; Harvey v. B E & K Construction, 30,825 (La.App.
  • Baldwin v. North American Energy Services 970 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    2 Cir. 8/19/98), , , (1951), in which the supreme court held that the determining factor that an employment contract was entered into in Louisiana was the existence of a definitive agreement prior to the plaintiff leaving his home in Louisiana and traveling to another state where a job awaited him.
  • Gary Baldwin v. North American Energy Services La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    2 Cir. 8/19/98), So.2d 803 (1951), in which the supreme court held that the determining factor that an employment contract was entered into in Louisiana was the existence of a definitive agreement prior to the plaintiff leaving his home in Louisiana and traveling to another state where a job awaited him.
  • Harvey v. BE & K CONST. 716 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    (1951); reversed on other grounds
  • Bolton v. Tulane University of Louisiana 692 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • Jepsen v. B-Con Const. Co., Inc. 475 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    (1951), to support their argument that the decedent was working under a Louisiana contract of *115 hire.
  • Wilson v. Gulf Ins. Co. 431 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    (1951) the plaintiff wrote to his former employer from Louisiana and asked to have his old job back whereupon the employer, a Delaware corporation, responded that if Ohlhausen were to come to Florida, he would be reinstated.
  • Thompson v. Teledyne Movible Offshore, Inc. 419 So. 2d 822 La. 1982
    175 (La.App.Orl.1940) at 178-79 in its decision, , (1951): Although there is no express stipulation contained in the statute to the effect that it shall have extra-territorial jurisdiction, it has been consistently held by our courts that, if the contract of employment is made within this State, the law will apply even though the employee was injured in
  • Ryder v. Insurance Company of North America 282 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
    540 , (1965); Ohlhausen v. Sternberg Dredging Company, et al., , (1951).
  • Welch v. Travelers Insurance Company 225 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    690 ; McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., supra, and Hunt v. Magnolia Petroleum Company, La.App., ; , (1951).
  • Mattel v. Pittman Construction Company 180 So. 2d 696 La. 1965
  • Crooks v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co. 175 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
    Williams v. Travelers Insurance Co., La.App.
  • Mattel v. Pittman Construction Co. 174 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    (1951); Selser v. Bragmans Bluff Lumber Co., 146 So.
  • Babineaux v. Southeastern Drilling Corporation 170 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
    For instance, he departed from Louisiana for overseas employment as a result of an offer made to him here in Louisiana, , 50 So.
  • Woodham v. Travelers Insurance Company 161 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
  • Brooks v. Griggs Casing Crews, Inc. 136 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    1044 ; , ; Hargis v. McWilliams Co., 9 La.App.
  • Reed v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance 83 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    : , , wherein the contract of employment was held to bé' a Louisiana contract, and, ‘therefore, under the provisions' of:the Louisiana Workmen’s Compensation Laws.- In' that case, the petitioner wrote defendant in Florida arid asked for his old job back.
  • Cobb v. International Paper Company 76 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
  • Ohlhausen v. Sternberg Dredging Co. 53 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    The Supreme Court granted a writ of cer-tiorari and, in an opinion dated January 9, 1951, , , reversed the judgment of this court, holding that the Louisiana Workmen’s Compensation Act did apply and remanded the case to us for a consideration of the merits.