Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jugger, 47 So. 2d 46.

14 citing documents.

Brown v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. 509 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Guin 444 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Curry 325 So. 2d 598 La. 1976
(1950), and cases cited therein.
State v. Witherspoon 292 So. 2d 499 La. 1974
State v. Bray 292 So. 2d 697 La. 1974
Moreover, , (1950), this Court negatived any inference that an accused is obliged to testify in order to establish involuntariness which may have been drawn from its discussion of an issue therein, in the following statement: "* * * Of course, we do not mean by this that an accused is obliged to take the stand in or
State v. Stephenson 291 So. 2d 767 La. 1974
(1950), the supreme court held that, there being no fraud or collusion, the excusing of over half of the venire (32 out of 50) was not in itself an abuse of discretion."
State v. Fallon 290 So. 2d 273 La. 1974
State v. Lampkin 218 So. 2d 289 La. 1969
State v. Ceaser 187 So. 2d 432 La. 1966
(1950); State v. Hoover, 203 La.
State v. Richard 158 So. 2d 828 La. 1963
691 , ; , ; State v. Sears, 217 La.
State v. Fulghum 138 So. 2d 569 La. 1962
* * ” , , Bills of Exceptions Nos. 1, 2 and 3 were based upon the asserted error of the trial judge in overruling defense counsel’s objection to the commencement of the trial on the ground that of the fifty names included on the jury panel only eighteen appeared for service, the judge having previously excused t
State v. Kennedy 95 So. 2d 301 La. 1957
State v. Goins 94 So. 2d 244 La. 1957
State v. Clark 57 So. 2d 904 La. 1952
and cases cited therein.