Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rosenthal v. Gauthier, 69 So. 2d 367.

41 citing documents.

Williams Engineering, Inc. v. Goodyear 496 So. 2d 1012 La. 1986
(1953) involved a standard architectural contract which did not have a cost limitation.
First National Bank v. Smith 490 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Fauria v. Doe 483 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
360 , (1956); , (1953); Rhodes v. Sinclair, 195 La.
Farnet v. Minyard 383 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
4th Cir. 1963); , (1953).
Recherche, Inc. v. Jewelry Jungle, Inc. 377 So. 2d 1329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
(1953); Smith v. Bell, 224 La.
Price v. Emile Babst Co. 377 So. 2d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
360 , (1956); , (1953); Rhodes v. Sinclair [Refining Co.], 195 La.
Southern Hardware Co. v. Honeywell Information 373 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
Stanley v. Orkin Extermination Co., Inc., (La.App.
Hicks v. Rucker Pharmacal Co., Inc. 367 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
Kleinschmidt, Brassette & Associates v. Ayres 368 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
4th Cir. 1963); , (1953).
Bostick v. Foret 351 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
(1953); Snow-White Roofs, (La.App.
Firmin v. Garber 343 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
International Harvester Credit Corp. v. McGill 297 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Galloway v. Employers Mutual of Wausau 286 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
360 , (1956); , (1953); Rhodes v. Sinclair, 195 La.
Moossy v. Huckabay Hospital, Inc. 283 So. 2d 699 La. 1973
Canter v. Koehring Company 283 So. 2d 716 La. 1973
360 , (1956); , (1953); Rhodes v. Sinclair, 195 La.
Moossy v. Huckabay Hospital, Inc. 266 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Reilly-Benton Co. v. Gurtler, Hebert & Co. 212 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
In Snow-White Roofs, Inc. v. Boucher, La.App., , the decision of this court was written by Judge Samuel, where the contract called for repairs to “Entire Roof Area” and pa-rol and collateral evidence was considered, , ; Rudman v. Dupuis, 206 La.
Snow-White Roofs, Inc. v. Boucher 182 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
386 , ; , ; Reuter v. Reuter's Succession, 206 La.
Tsoi v. Ebenezer Baptist Church 153 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Hirsch v. Kuhne 149 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Arata v. Sunseri 147 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Defendant contends that he is entitled to a judgment dismissing plaintiff’s demand under the rule that an architect who fails to furnish plans and specifications substantially within an agreed cost limit is not entitled to a fee, citing Bruno v. Williams, La.App., , , , Andry & Feitel v. Ewing, 15 La.App.
Scheppegrell v. Barth 117 So. 2d 903 La. 1960
911 , ; , ; Olivier v. Abunza, 226 La.
Gravity Drainage District No. 1 v. Key 99 So. 2d 82 La. 1958
Smith v. Westchester Fire Insurance Company of New York, 227 La.
Dufrene v. Tracy 94 So. 2d 297 La. 1957
1061 , ; , ; Plaquemines Oil & Development Co. v. State, 208 La.
Fouquier v. Fouquier 91 So. 2d 591 La. 1956
Second Church of Christ, Scientist v. Spencer 88 So. 2d 810 La. 1956
911 , ; , ; Olivier v. Abunza, 226 La.
Southwest Gas Producing Co. v. Hattie Brothers 88 So. 2d 649 La. 1956
911 , ; , ; Olivier v. Abunza, 226 La.
Barrett Division of Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Kennedy Saw Mills, Inc. 88 So. 2d 5 La. 1956
911 , ; , ; Olivier v. Abunza, 226 La.
Allison v. Pick 86 So. 2d 179 La. 1956
911 , ; , ; Olivier v. Abunza, 226 La.
Holmes Company v. Foret 86 So. 2d 66 La. 1956
Holmes Co. v. Foret 86 So. 2d 66 La. 1956
Allison v. Pick 86 So. 2d 179 La. 1956
911 , ; , ; Olivier v. Abunza, 226 La.
Johnson v. Capital City Ford Company 85 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
The parol evidence rule in Louisiana, , , at page 369, is as follows: "`When persons commit their agreements to writing, their intentions and purposes cannot be sought outside the four corners of the written instrument.
Smith v. Westchester Fire Insurance 80 So. 2d 418 La. 1955
Succession of Gaines 79 So. 2d 322 La. 1955
Davis v. Lewis & Lewis 78 So. 2d 174 La. 1954
Bruno v. Williams 76 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
Olivier v. Abunza 76 So. 2d 528 La. 1954
State ex rel. Parrish v. Calcasieu Parish School Board 74 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
325 ], , and Rosenthal v. Gauthier [ ], , and Article 2276 of the[ LSA-] Civil Code of this State, the Court is of the opinion that the objection to parol testimony to explain or supplement or add to the contract was good, and for purposes of this decision, said evidence is excluded.” * * * * * * “A reading of the contract signed by the part
Bruno v. Gauthier 70 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1954
It was so held in Rosenthal v. Gauthier, La.Sup., , in which the Supreme Court quoted with approval from the opinion of the District Judge as follows: "`* * * where an architect furnished plans and specifications for a building in excess of the originally contemplated cost that the defendant would not be liable for the architect's fee, and the Court believes tha
Carpenter v. Skinner 71 So. 2d 133 La. 1954