Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite City of New Orleans v. Noto, 47 So. 2d 36.

40 citing documents.

Princeville Canning Company v. Hamilton 159 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
State v. Brooks 152 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1963
669 , ; , ; City of Shreveport v. Abe Meyer Corp., 219 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. O'Neal 150 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
140 , ; , ; Texas Pacific-Missouri Pac.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Bourgeois 146 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
2d 878 .” Though the Rooks and Rouprich opinions appear to be irreconcilable, the methods adopted in the two cases are distinguished by Justice McCaleb as the organ of the Supreme Court in City of New Orleans v. *645 Noto, , at page 37, where the Court held: “In addition, defendants tendered an architect who testified that the replacement costs of the buildings located on the land would be $4,314 and it is here contended that this amount should be added to the admitted value of the lots and empl
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Olivier 145 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1962
669 , ; , ; City of Shreveport v. Abe Meyer Corp., 219 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Bundy 143 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
669 , ; , ; City of Shreveport v. Abe Meter Corp., 219 La.
Trunkline Gas Co. v. Cassidy 138 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Latil 137 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
Mississippi River Bridge Authority v. Gwin 138 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
State v. Gras 131 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
887 , ; , ; Housing Authority of Shreveport v. Green, 200 La.
State v. Crockett 131 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
887 , ; , ; Housing Authority of Shreveport v. Green, 200 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. McNeely 130 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
669 , ; , ; City of Shreveport v. Abe Meter Corp., 219 La.
Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. Morehouse Realty Co. 126 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Cook 124 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
It is urgently contended on behalf of plaintiff that the basis of replacement cost upon which the judgment appealed from was predicated is an unfair method of arriving at the market value of improvements, , .
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. McDuffie 123 So. 2d 93 La. 1960
2d 37 ; City of New Orleans v. Noto, 1950, , .
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Havard 118 So. 2d 131 La. 1960
669 , ; , ; City of Shreveport v. Abe Meter Corp., 219 La.
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Central Realty Investment Co. 117 So. 2d 261 La. 1960
463 , ; , ; Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Boudwine, 224 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Esnard 117 So. 2d 52 La. 1960
669 , ; , ; City of Shreveport v. Abe Meyer Corp., 219 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Hub Realty Co. 118 So. 2d 364 La. 1960
463 , ; , ; Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Boudwine, 224 La.
Parish of Iberia v. Cook 116 So. 2d 491 La. 1959
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Stoer 116 So. 2d 498 La. 1959
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Barber 115 So. 2d 864 La. 1959
Mississippi River Bridge Authority v. Curry, supra; , .
Efurd v. City of Shreveport 105 So. 2d 219 La. 1958
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Sullivan 103 So. 2d 458 La. 1958
675 ; , ; Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Persson, 203 La.
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Mortallaro 101 So. 2d 450 La. 1958
669 , ; , ; City of Shreveport v. Abe Meyer Corp., 219 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Ragusa 99 So. 2d 20 La. 1958
669 , ; , ; City of Shreveport v. Abe Meyer Corp., 219 La.
Housing Authority v. Waters 96 So. 2d 560 La. 1957
463 , ; , ; Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Brinkmann (Young) [ 224 La.
Mississippi River Bridge Authority v. Simon 95 So. 2d 144 La. 1957
877 ; , ; Rapides Parish School Board v. Nassif, 232 La.
Mississippi River Bridge Authority v. Curry 94 So. 2d 9 La. 1957
136 , ; , ; and Recreation and Park Commission of East Baton Rouge Parish v. Perkins, La., 93 So.
Mississippi River Bridge Authority v. Curry 94 So. 2d 9 La. 1957
136 , ; , ; and Recreation and Park Commission of East Baton Rouge Parish v. Perkins, La., .
Rapides Parish School Board v. Nassif 94 So. 2d 40 La. 1957
877 ; , , and that where the record contains no satisfactory evidence of sales comparable to that involved, ascertainment of the true value must be sought by a consideration of other factors and circumstances, Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Boudwine, 224 La.
Recreation and Park Commission v. Perkins 93 So. 2d 198 La. 1957
Housing Authority v. Polmer 91 So. 2d 600 La. 1956
Caddo Parish School Board v. Bland 82 So. 2d 687 La. 1955
463 , ; , ; Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Brinkmann, [ 224 La.
State, Dept. of Hwys. v. Ferris 78 So. 2d 493 La. 1955
State v. Ferris 78 So. 2d 493 La. 1955
Caddo Parish School Board v. Willer 78 So. 2d 833 La. 1955
Housing Authority v. Boudwine 71 So. 2d 541 La. 1954
463 , , , , Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Brinkmann (Young) La.Sup., , and the numerous cases therein cited.
Housing Authority v. Brinkmann 69 So. 2d 37 La. 1953
Greater Baton Rouge Port Commission v. Watson 68 So. 2d 901 La. 1953
6 , where the Supreme Court said: “ ‘When private property is expropriated for public purposes the owner is entitled to its market value at the time it is taken which is its fair value between one who wants to purchase and one who wants to sell under usual and ordinary circumstances.’ “(3) In order to establish value of property to be taken, the Supreme Court in City of New Orleans v. Noto, 1950, , , held that evidence of numerous sales of neighboring property ‘is perhaps the best criterion of t