Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Girven v. Miller, 52 So. 2d 843.

14 citing documents.

  • Montgomery v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund 51 So. 3d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    838 (1930); , (1951); Voinche v. Town of Marlcsville, 124 La.
  • In re the Succession of Baker 432 So. 2d 817 La. 1983
    (1951); Succession of Hall, 141 La.
  • Succession of Jones 377 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
    860 , ; , ; Succession of Maguire, 228 La.
  • Succession of Stewart 287 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    1096 , (1955); , (1951); Succession of Hall, 141 La.
  • Succession of Barnett 245 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
  • Crichton v. Succession of Gredler 235 So. 2d 411 La. 1970
    447 , (1955); , (1951); Maddox v. Butchee, 203 La.
  • Succession of Barry 196 So. 2d 265 La. 1967
    860 , ; , ; Succession of Maguire, 228 La.
  • Succession of Simms 195 So. 2d 114 La. 1966
    1712, 1713; , ; Succession of Feitel, 176 La.
  • Bonner v. Board of Trustees 181 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    art. 1713 provides: “A disposition must be understood in the sense in which it can have effect, rather than that in which it can have none.” , , the court held: “In interpretation of acts of last will we are bound, under Article 1712 of the Civil Code, to ascertain the intention of the testator ‘without departing, however, from the proper signification of the terms of the testament’ and it is our duty, under Article 1713, to construe the dispo
  • Succession of Rogers 138 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
  • In Re Succession of Abraham. 136 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
  • Succession of Maguire 85 So. 2d 4 La. 1955
    802 ; , ; Succession of Herber, 128 La.
  • Succession of Johnson 67 So. 2d 591 La. 1953
    844 in which it was specifically held that a will which contained a disposition reading: “I leave all I die possessed of to Rev. William A. Miller, CSSR.
  • Succession of Rougon 65 So. 2d 104 La. 1953