Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Girven v. Miller, 52 So. 2d 843.
-
Montgomery v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund
51 So. 3d 60
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
838 (1930); , (1951); Voinche v. Town of Marlcsville, 124 La.
-
In re the Succession of Baker
432 So. 2d 817
La. 1983
(1951); Succession of Hall, 141 La.
-
Succession of Jones
377 So. 2d 881
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
860 , ; , ; Succession of Maguire, 228 La.
-
Succession of Stewart
287 So. 2d 609
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
1096 , (1955); , (1951); Succession of Hall, 141 La.
- Succession of Barnett 245 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
-
Crichton v. Succession of Gredler
235 So. 2d 411
La. 1970
447 , (1955); , (1951); Maddox v. Butchee, 203 La.
-
Succession of Barry
196 So. 2d 265
La. 1967
860 , ; , ; Succession of Maguire, 228 La.
-
Succession of Simms
195 So. 2d 114
La. 1966
1712, 1713; , ; Succession of Feitel, 176 La.
-
Bonner v. Board of Trustees
181 So. 2d 255
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
art. 1713 provides: “A disposition must be understood in the sense in which it can have effect, rather than that in which it can have none.” , , the court held: “In interpretation of acts of last will we are bound, under Article 1712 of the Civil Code, to ascertain the intention of the testator ‘without departing, however, from the proper signification of the terms of the testament’ and it is our duty, under Article 1713, to construe the dispo
- Succession of Rogers 138 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
- In Re Succession of Abraham. 136 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
-
Succession of Maguire
85 So. 2d 4
La. 1955
802 ; , ; Succession of Herber, 128 La.
-
Succession of Johnson
67 So. 2d 591
La. 1953
844 in which it was specifically held that a will which contained a disposition reading: “I leave all I die possessed of to Rev. William A. Miller, CSSR.
- Succession of Rougon 65 So. 2d 104 La. 1953