Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Landry, 53 So. 2d 232.

18 citing documents.

Monroe Redevelopment Agency v. Effron Land Corp. 294 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
1st Cir. 1964); , (1951).
State v. Jackson Brewing Company 146 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
(Louisiana Supreme Court 1951) the court held as follows: "All other issues raised by the pleadings other than the claims for money which the defendants may have as compensation for the property sought to be expropriated have passed out the case.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Kemp 141 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
: “We are aware, of course, that there are several kinds of evidence which may be taken into consideration in determining the value of property which has to be condemned in an expropriation suit.
State v. Kurtz 143 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
988 , ; , ; City of New Orleans v. Larroux, 203 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Bundy 143 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
990 , ; , , and Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Brinkmann (Young), [ 224 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Chappell 137 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
262 , ; , ; City of New Orleans v. Larroux, 203 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Ebrecht 135 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
990 , ; , ; Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Brinkmann, 224 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Crockett 134 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
In State, Through Department of Highways v. McNeely, La.App., , the court stated: “In many instances, however, comparable sales of properties in the vicinity which furnish the criteria for the market data approach are not *344 available for arriving at the market value of the property taken, and in such instances other methods * * * must he resorted to.” , , the Court states: “We are aware, of course, that there are several kinds of evidence which may be taken into consideration in determining t
State v. Gras 131 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
988 , ; State v. Landry, 1951, , .
Central La. El. Co. v. Covington & St. Tammany L. & I. Co. 131 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
City of Gretna v. Mitchell, La.App., 64 So.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. McNeely 130 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
990 , ; , , and Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Brinkman (Young) [ 224 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Esnard 117 So. 2d 52 La. 1960
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. Tieman 112 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
990 , ; , , and Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Brinkmann, 224 La.
Housing Authority v. Waters 96 So. 2d 560 La. 1957
990 , , , , and Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Brinkmann [ 224 La.
Housing Authority v. Boudwine 71 So. 2d 541 La. 1954
990 , , , , and Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Brinkmann (Young), supra.
Housing Authority v. Brinkmann 69 So. 2d 37 La. 1953
However, effect should be given to the testimony of all of such witnesses, City of New Orleans v. Larroux, supra, , ; and when that is done the lot without the improvements is found to have had a valuation of $40 per front foot or of $1,296.67 in its entirety (32'' 5" frontage).
Greater Baton Rouge Port Commission v. Watson 68 So. 2d 901 La. 1953
“(5) , : “ 'Courts will take judicial notice that values of all kinds of property have increased materially in the past few years prior to 1951.’ “(6) Housing Authority of Shreveport v. Green, 200 La.
City of Gretna v. Mitchell 64 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
the Supreme Court, in construing LSA-R.S.