Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Landry, 53 So. 2d 908.
-
St. Bernard Port, Harbor & Terminal District v. Violet Dock Port, Inc.
147 So. 3d 1266
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
(“The rule is well settled that the measure of value of property expropriated for public use is the market value of the property at the date of institution of the expropriation suit.”) In support of its claims regarding the value of the Violet Dock Port property, St.
- Board of Com'rs v. Missouri Pacific R. Co. 625 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
-
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Brandt
246 So. 2d 876
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
(1951); State Through Dept, of Highways v. Johnson, supra.
-
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Colomb
225 So. 2d 280
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
City of Alexandria v. Jones, 236 La.
- State, Through Department of Highways v. Martin 196 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
- State v. Rapier 152 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
-
State v. Jackson Brewing Company
146 So. 2d 504
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
Other decisions indicating the mandatory nature of the requirement, under the general expropriation law, , and Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Dileo, La.App., .
-
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Johnson
141 So. 2d 54
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Louisiana Railway & Navigation Co. v. Sarpy, 125 La.
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Levy 136 So. 2d 35 La. 1961
-
State v. Hedwig, Inc.
133 So. 2d 180
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
City of Alexandria v. Jones, 236 La.
-
Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. De Bouchel
117 So. 2d 94
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
in which the Court said: “ * * * in view of defendant’s failure to file his answer timely, he is presumed to have waived all defenses except claims for money as compensation and as damages.
- Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Simmons 85 So. 2d 251 La. 1956
- Koerber v. City of New Orleans 84 So. 2d 454 La. 1955
- Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Dileo 79 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
-
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Chadick
76 So. 2d 398
La. 1954
“The rule is well settled that the measure of value of property expropriated for public use is the market value of the property at the date of institution of the expropriation suit.” , .
-
City of Gretna v. Mitchell
64 So. 2d 873
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
* * * ” , , the Court said: “ * * * in view of defendant’s failure to file his answer timely, he is presumed to have waived all defenses except claims for money .as compensation and as damages.