39986 Precedential Processed

Succession of Aurianne

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed May 28, 1951 · 53 So. 2d 901

Cited by

Sue Soileau Brignac Durand v. Vistana Falls Condominium Association, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
Ville Platte Concrete Service, Inc. v. Joshua Paul Manuel, Et Ux. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
E. Smith Plumbing, Inc. v. Manuel 88 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Slaughter v. ARCO Chemical Company 931 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Bridges v. Bridges 692 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Scull v. Brown 645 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Smith v. McKeller 638 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Lima v. Schmidt 595 So. 2d 624 La. 1992
Queen v. W. & W. CLARKLIFT, INC. 537 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Board of Levee Commissioners of Orleans Levee District v. Newport Ltd. 517 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Bordelon's, Inc. v. Littell 490 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Liberty Personnel, Inc. v. CHILDREN'S HOSP. 487 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986

Opinion text

FOURNET, Chief Justice (concurring). I readily concur with the conclusions expressed by the majority that the testatrix, by the language used in her last will, did not intend thereby to renounce the prescription that had accrued on her obligation to,her sister; nor was it intended as an acknowledgment; but the effect of her act was clearly the recognition of the natural obligation on her part to pay this amount, Article 1758, par. 3, and a giving in compliance with such obligation, Article 1759, par. 1.