DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Houston, 925 So. 2d 690.

14 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Michael Duck La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
    App. 2 Cir. 3/10/06), writ denied, 06-0796 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Orlandus Bathdomus Marcelius Prude La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
    App. 2 Cir. 3/10/06), writ denied, 2006-0796 (La.
  • State v. Terry 108 So. 3d 126 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Houston, 40,642 (La.App.2d Cir.3/10/06), , writ denied, 06-0796 (La.10/13/06), , appeal after new sentencing hearing, 41,743 (La.App.2d Cir.3/28/07), .
  • State v. Mitchell 996 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    2d Cir.3/10/06), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/13/06), ; State v. Maxie, 33,982 (La.App.
  • State v. Caston 996 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    2d Cir.3/10/06), , writ denied, 06-796 (La.10/13/06), .
  • State v. Bowman 966 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    2 Cir. 3/10/06), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/13/06), .
  • State v. Roberts 966 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    2d Cir.3/10/06), , writ denied, 06-0796 (La.10/13/06), , the defendant challenged the admissibility of a video tape of an interview with a child on the ground that the interviewer asked leading questions.
  • State v. Beasley 960 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    2 Cir. 3/10/06), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/13/06), .
  • State v. Houston 954 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    2d Cir.3/10/06), , we amended one of Houston’s convictions for molestation of a juvenile to attempted molestation of a juvenile, and remanded the amended conviction to the trial court for sentencing.
  • State v. Scott 948 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    App. 2 Cir. 3/10/06), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/13/06), .
  • State v. Zeigler 945 So. 2d 946 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    This court recently reviewed a case factually similar to the present case in State v. Houston, 40,642 (La.App.2d Cir.03/10/06), , wherein the defendant argued that the state failed to meet its burden of proof under Shelton, supra, because the court minutes did not list the specific rights to which the appellant had been advised.
  • State v. Hanson 938 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Smith 935 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    2d Cir.03/10/06), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Humphries 927 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Moreover, this court encountered a which was sent to the panel in January 2006.