Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lawrence, 925 So. 2d 727.

17 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Michael Edwin Vice La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
2 Cir. 3/15/06), –50, the second circuit discussed the use of copies or duplicates: The defendant points out that, at trial, Ms. Taylor stated that the 911 tape was a copy of the original.
State Of Louisiana v. Jonathan Richardson La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
App. 2nd Cir. 3/ 15/ 06), a probation officer testified at trial that she had supervised the defendant for an attempted manslaughter conviction, and she positively identified the defendant in court as the person she supervised.
State v. Duhon 270 So. 3d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 2d Cir. 3/15/06), , 741, the defendant argued that the State's decision to sever his trial from that of a co-defendant denied him the right to a fair trial and due process.
In re Houston 253 So. 3d 836 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. M S La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
2d Cir. 3/15/06), a recording of a 911 call made by a robbery victim immediately after a robbery was held admissible under the excited utterance rule.
State v. Williams 81 So. 3d 220 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
See State v. Lawrence, 40,278 (La.App.2d Cir.3/15/06), .
State of Louisiana v. Charles Edward Grace La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Grace 61 So. 3d 812 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Clyde A. Bowens La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Griffin 30 So. 3d 1039 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
2d Cir.3/15/06), , a recording of a 911 call made by a robbery victim immediately after a robbery was held admissible under the excited utterance rule.
State v. Wilson 26 So. 3d 210 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Beaner 974 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Lawrence, 40,278 and 40,796 (La.App.2d Cir.3/15/06), ; State v. Hansbro, 35,027 (La.
State v. Brown 966 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Gage 965 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Grant 954 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
In State v. Lawrence, 40,278 (La.App.2d Cir.3/15/06), , the defendant argued that the state's decision to sever his trial from that of a co-defendant denied him the right to a fair trial and due process.
State v. Coleman 949 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
1940 , 164 L.Ed.2d 669 (2006); State v. Lawrence, 40,278 (La.App.2d Cir.3/15/06), ; State v. Jones, *574 41,449 (La.App.2d Cir.9/20/06), .
State v. Shumaker 945 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Lawrence, 40,278 (La.App.2d Cir.03/15/06), .