DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lafitte v. Rutherford House, Inc., 917 So. 2d 684.

14 citing documents.

  • Matthew Sims v. Office of Employment Security and City of Monroe La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
  • Williams v. Eysink 163 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    of State of La., Lafitte v. Rutherford House, Inc., 40,395 (La.App.2d Cir.12/14/05), ; Marchand v. Forster, 37,222 (La.App.2d Cir.6/25/03), .
  • Jackson v. Office of Employment Security 137 So. 3d 180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Menyweather, supra; Lafitte v. Rutherford House, Inc., 40,895 (La.App.2d Cir.12/14/05), .
  • Cornelious v. Louisiana Workforce Commission 130 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    23:1634(B), which provides that “the findings of the board of review as to the facts, if supported by sufficient evidence and in the absence of fraud, shall be conclusive, and the jurisdiction of the court shall be confined to questions of law.” See Lafitte v. Rutherford House, Inc., 40,395 (La.App.2d Cir.12/14/05), .
  • Bell v. Goodwill Industries of North Louisiana, Inc. 110 So. 3d 632 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    Menyweather, supra; Lafitte v. Rutherford House Inc., 40,-395 (La.App.2d Cir.12/14/05), .
  • Johnson v. DYKES OIL CO. 72 So. 3d 418 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Delta American Healthcare, Inc. v. Burgess, 41,108 (La.App.2d Cir.5/17/06), ; Lafitte v. Rutherford House, Inc., 40,395 (La.App.2d Cir.12/14/05), .
  • Bowden v. Louisiana Board of Review, Office of Regulatory Services 57 So. 3d 513 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    23:1634, which provides that “findings of the Board of Review as to the facts, if supported by sufficient evidence and in the absence of *517 fraud, shall be conclusive, and the jurisdiction of the court (on appeal) shall be confined to questions of law.” Lafitte v. Rutherford House, 40,395 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/14/05), , citing, La.
  • Baughman v. COVENANT TRANSPORT, INC. 34 So. 3d 1087 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Menyweather, supra; Lafitte v. Rutherford House Inc., 40,395 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/14/05), .
  • Charles King v. Louisiana Workforce Commission, Office of Regulatory Service La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • King v. Louisiana Workforce Commission 20 So. 3d 1211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Menyweather v. OFFICE OF EMPLOYMENT SEC. 981 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    2 Cir. 12/14/05), , and citations therein.
  • City of Monroe v. Tolliver 954 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    2d Cir.12/14/05), ; Wood v. Louisiana Dept. of Employment Security, 25,545 (La.App.2d Cir.02/23/94), ; (La.App.
  • Jackson v. Louisiana Board of Review 948 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    5In Lafitte v. Rutherford House, Inc., 40,395 (La.App.2d Cir.12/14/05), , this court observed: Based on this statutory provision, the jurisprudence has defined judicial review in cases such as this one as requiring a determination of whether the facts are supported by competent evidence and whether the facts, as a matter of law, justify the action taken.
  • Delta American Healthcare, Inc. v. Burgess 930 So. 2d 1108 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    2d Cir.12/14/05), , this court observed: Based on this statutory provision, the jurisprudence has defined judicial review in cases such as this one as requiring a determination of whether the facts are supported by competent evidence and whether the facts, as a matter of law, justify the action taken.