Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cooling v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., 269 So. 2d 294.

19 citing documents.

Judith Langlinais Mistich v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Mistich v. Weeks 107 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Cadwallader v. Allstate Ins. Co. 848 So. 2d 577 La. 2003
2 Cir.1974); Cooling v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., (La.App.
Gordon v. Southern United Fire Ins. Co. 679 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
2 Cir.1974); Cooling v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., (La.App.
Charles v. LeBlanc 633 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Allstate Insurance Co. v. Romero 579 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Allstate Insurance Co. v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange 544 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Little v. Kalo Laboratories, Inc. 424 So. 2d 1065 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
App.1944); Cooling v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., (La.App.
State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Avant 404 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
writ denied and Templet v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc., (La.App.
Ada Resources v. Don Chamblin & Associates 361 So. 2d 1339 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
As to the alleged negligence of Seaboard in delivering the wrong joint and in failing to inspect the joint before delivery, we conclude that the decision rendered by this *1343 (La.
Davey v. Louisiana Health Serv. & Indem. Co. 357 So. 2d 1170 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
(Citing, Cooling v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., La.App., ; Corkern v. Main Insurance Company, Chicago, Ill., La.App., ; St.
U. S. Fire Insurance v. Liss 357 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
522 , and Cooling v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, (La.App.
Aetna Ins. Co. v. Emmons 348 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
[2] Cooling v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., La.App., ; Corkern v. Main Insurance Company, Chicago, Ill., La.
Templet v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc. 341 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Hobbs v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Companies 339 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
1950; Cooling v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., (La.App.
Mut v. Newark Insurance Company 289 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Relying upon Cooling v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., La.App., , Contractor argues that Travelers' attempted exclusion of completed operations hazard coverage is ineffective in this instance.
Meier v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Company 281 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
The sole authority relied on by plaintiff is Cooling v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, (La.App.
Oceanonics, Inc. v. Petroleum Distributing Company 280 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Cooling v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 272 So. 2d 373 La. 1973