Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Tuminello v. Mawby, 57 So. 2d 666.

51 citing documents.

Young v. Ford Motor Co., Inc. 595 So. 2d 1123 La. 1992
However, twenty years later, , , 669 n. 1 (1952), the court stated: "It is questionable that the Kodel case repudiated or limited the Doyle case or the George case, but, if it did, we consider the Doyle and George cases sound and would refuse to follow the Kodel case here."
Holloway v. Gulf Motors, Inc. 588 So. 2d 1322 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
(1952); LaFrance v. Abraham Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., (La.App.
Goodman v. Roberts 587 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
2546; Tuminello v. Mawby [ ], "
Beth Israel v. Bartley, Inc. 579 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Pastor v. Lafayette Bldg. Ass'n 567 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
2d Cir.1972), amended , (1952)."
Bunge Corp. v. Gatx Corp. 557 So. 2d 1376 La. 1990
Jordan v. Employee Transfer Corp. 509 So. 2d 420 La. 1987
Smith v. HJ Landreneau Bldg. Contractor 426 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
(1952) and stated 57 So.2d at page 667 : "....
Melancon v. Continental Oil Co. 420 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
116 , (1955); , (1952); George v. Shreveport Cotton Oil Co., 114 La.
Saad v. Anderson 416 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Fortmayer v. Schulingkamp 405 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Nor can this court find merit in the plaintiff’s argument the defendant in the present case must be presumed, under jurisprudence, to have known of the defect, , (1952); (La.App.
Bustamante v. Manale 397 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Art. 2545; , (1952); (La.App.
DeSoto v. Ellis 393 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Manzanares v. AMERICAN INTERN. FOREST PRODUCTS, INC. 389 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
In doing so, he relied on the following language from Brown v. Dauzat, supra , (La.
Higginbotham v. Curry 373 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
2d Cir. 1972), amended , (1952).” at pp. 74-75.
Henson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 363 So. 2d 711 La. 1978
Alexander v. Burroughs Corp. 359 So. 2d 607 La. 1978
116 , (1955); , (1952); George v. Shreveport Cotton Oil Co., 114 La.
Franklin v. American Motors Corp. 344 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Dean v. Hercules Incorporated 328 So. 2d 69 La. 1976
137 (1939); amended , (1952).
Weaver v. Fleetwood Homes of Mississippi, Inc. 327 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Schamens v. Crow 326 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
(1952), where knowledge of defects was imputed to a builder-vendor of a residence.
LeBlanc v. Ellerbee Builders, Inc. 317 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
(1952), for the proposition that Ellerbee in the instant case was a "builder" and under the jurisprudence of this state, an artisan, craftsman, builder or manufacturer is presumed to know of the vice or defect in articles he constructs, manufactures or builds.
Moreno's, Inc. v. LAKE CHARLES CATHOLIC HIGH SCHS., INC. 315 So. 2d 660 La. 1975
v. Mawby et al., , (1952); George v. Shreveport Cotton Oil Co., 114 La.
Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Company, Inc. 315 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
116 , (1955); , (1952); George v. Shreveport Cotton Oil Company, 114 La.
Peltier v. Seabird Industries, Inc. 304 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., , (1952); George v. Shreveport Cotton Oil Co., 114 La.
Stelly v. Gerber Products Company 299 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
See, e. g., Tuminello v. Mawby, 1952, , .
Rey v. Cuccia 298 So. 2d 840 La. 1974
116 , (1955); , (1952); George v. Shreveport Cotton Oil Co., 114 La.
Spillers v. MONTGOMERY WARD & COMPANY, INC. 294 So. 2d 803 La. 1974
Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. 282 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
116 , (1955); , (1952); Doyle v. Fuerst & Kraemer, 129 La.
RO Roy & Company, Inc. v. a & W TRAILER SALES 277 So. 2d 204 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of NY 250 So. 2d 754 La. 1971
116 , (1955); , (1952); Doyle v. Fuerst & Kraemer, 129 La.
Compte v. Rateau 242 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
and authorities there cited.
Cub Beverage Co. v. Transportation Equipment Co. 223 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Templeman Bros. Lumber Co. v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co., 129 La.
Minot Hooper Co. v. Crowley Industrial Bag Co. 217 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
919 , ; , ; Doyle v. Fuerst & Kraemer, 129 La.
Sikes v. B & S Supply, Inc. 164 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
v. Mawby et al., , ; Templeman Bros. Lumber Co. v. Fairbanks Morse & Co., 129 La.
Gabriel v. Jeansonne 162 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
Morehouse Ice Co. v. Tooke & Reynolds, La.App., 154 So.
Brown v. Dauzat 157 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
(extensive discussion of French and Louisiana authorities).
Pursell v. Kelly 139 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
142 , ; , ; McEachern v. Plauche Lumber & Construction Co., Inc., 220 La.
Hermeling v. Whitmore 140 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Art. 2545 and 2546, McEachern v. Plauche Lumber & Construction Company, supra, , , Johnson v. Hunter, La.App., , Daly v. Abramson, La.App., , DePietro v. LeBlanc, La.App., .
Russell v. Bartlett 139 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
1099 , ; , ; Johnson v. Hunter, La.App., , and many other cases.
Daly v. Abramson 117 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
906 , 40 L.R.A.,N.S., 480; , ; Radalec, Incorporated v. Automatic Firing Corporation, 228 La.
Deshotel v. Higgins 109 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1959
575 ; Tuminello v. Mawby [ ], Morehouse Ice Co., Inc. v. Tooke & Reynolds, La.App., 154 So.
Johnson v. Hunter 88 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
the plaintiff sought a diminution of the purchase price of a brick veneer dwelling purchased by him from the defendants due to defects in construction, primarily of the foundation, resulting in the cracking of the plastered walls, and, eventually, the brick walls, producing fissures, or a parting of t
Cipriano v. Superior Realty & Construction Corp. 84 So. 2d 822 La. 1955
Plaintiff, in support of his right to recover the entire amount claimed as well as his right to recover from the contractor Sherman and the surety on his bond, , , and Breaux v. Laird, 223 La.
Radalec, Incorporated v. Automatic Firing Corp. 81 So. 2d 830 La. 1955
and authorities there cited.
Rodriguez v. Hudson 79 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
575 ; Tuminello v. Mawby [ ], ; Morehouse Ice Co., Inc., v. Tooke & Reynolds, La.App., 154 So.
Mattes v. Heintz 69 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
De Armas v. Gray, 10 La 575; Tuminello v. Mawby [ ], ; Morehouse Ice Co., Inc., v. Tooke & Reynolds, La.
Mohana v. Woodall 69 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
Doyle v. Fuerst & Kraemer, Ltd., 129 La.
Di Pietro v. Le Blanc 68 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
668: "Under the French law as well as under the jurisprudence of this state the artisan, craftsman, builder, or manufacturer is presumed to know of the vice or defect in the article he constructs, manufactures, or builds."
Sterbcow v. Peres 64 So. 2d 195 La. 1953