Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Solari, 50 So. 2d 801.

20 citing documents.

Musculoskeletal Institute of Louisiana v. McDonald's Corp. 48 So. 3d 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Public Housing Administration v. Housing Authority of Bogalusa 123 So. 2d 893 La. 1960
Ralph's Fleet, Inc. v. American Marine Corp. 118 So. 2d 877 La. 1960
State v. Orleans Parish School Board 118 So. 2d 127 La. 1960
The appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, as fixed and established by Section 10 of Article 7 of the Constitution of 1921, LSA, extends to seven different classes of cases as enumerated therein; and in the , , in which was cited the case of First Nat.
Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. California Co. 118 So. 2d 124 La. 1960
Theodos v. City of Bossier City 104 So. 2d 155 La. 1958
9 , and , that this Court will not take appellate jurisdiction over suits for declaratory judgment unless the suit is one which falls within the classification set out in Section 10 of Article 7 of the LSA-Constitution of 1921.
Haney v. Dunn 93 So. 2d 532 La. 1957
588 ; , and Board of Com’rs [of Port of New Orleans] v. Hibernia Nat.
State ex rel. Claiborne v. Distefano 87 So. 2d 705 La. 1956
Article 7, Section 1, Louisiana Constitution-LSA; , ; State ex rel.
Attaway v. Melton 85 So. 2d 50 La. 1956
In , , we stated: *115 “The term ‘the amount in dispute’ in the article of the Constitution fixing appellate jurisdiction means the value of what the plaintiff claims and what the defendant disputes the plaintiff’s claim for.
Dixon v. Zemurray 79 So. 2d 738 La. 1955
1 ; , ; Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. McHenery, 222 La.
Parker v. Tillman 69 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
9 , , , , Board of Commissioners of Port of New Orleans v. Hibernia National Bank, 219 La.
Succession of Goree 68 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
Cited as authority that this court should retain jurisdiction is the Succession of Solari, 1951, , .
D'Asaro v. Cotonio 66 So. 2d 572 La. 1953
339 ; , ; Hebert v. T. L. James & Co., 221 La.
Nelson v. Associated Branch of Pilots 61 So. 2d 463 La. 1952
Hebert v. T. L. James & Co. 61 So. 2d 734 La. 1952
he provision that the appellate court having jurisdiction of the main demand is the court that has jurisdiction on an appeal from a judgment on a reconventional or other incidental demand, which presently appears in Section 1 of Article VII of the Constitution, was also contained in the Constitutions of 1898 and 1913, being Article 95 in each of those ¡Constitutions.” In the , , it was stated: “* * * Reconventional and incidental demands merely follow the main demand.
State ex rel. Sitges v. Bayou Terre Aux Boeuf Drainage Dist. 60 So. 2d 895 La. 1952
and authorities cited therein.
Krokroskia v. Martin 58 So. 2d 205 La. 1952
9 , , it was pointed out that the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, as fixed and established by Section 10 of Article 7 of the Constitution of 1921, extends to seven different classes of cases as enumerated therein by this court, and in , , the case of First Nat.
Grace v. Boggs 55 So. 2d 768 La. 1951
*28 671, and Board of Com’rs v. Hibernia Nat.
Heikamp v. Succession of Solari 54 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1951
Board of Com'rs v. Hibernia Nat. Bank 52 So. 2d 753 La. 1951