Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Arata v. Orleans Capitol Stores, Inc., 55 So. 2d 239.

47 citing documents.

  • Erica Dyer v. Montclair Parc, L.L.C., d/b/a Montclair Parks Assisted Living, and the Chateaus at Montclair, L.L.C. d/b/a … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
    Arata v. 5 Orleans Capitol Stores, 55 So.
  • Cusimano v. Estate of Caillouet 182 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
    5 The Louisiana Supreme Court has recently reiterated that, “[t]he burden for tort liability arising from a defect in a public sidewalk is generally with , the municipality, not the adjoining landowner, unless the abutting property owner negligently caused a defect in the sidewalk.” Bufkin v. Felipe’s La., LLC, -60
  • Roy Bufkin, Jr. v. Felipe's Louisiana, LLC 171 So. 3d 851 La. 2014
    1045, 1058-60, Stern v. Davies, 128 La.
  • Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury 934 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    (1951); White v. City of Alexandria, 216 La.
  • John Hebert, Et Ux. v. Rapides Parish Police Jury La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    So.2d 239 (1951); White v. City of Alexandria, 216 La.
  • Thumfart v. Lombard 613 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    425 , (1964); , (1951); (La.App.
  • Babin v. Burnside Terminal 577 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    Arata v. Orleans Capitol Stores, Inc., , Allemand v. Zip's Trucking Co., Inc., (La.App.
  • Allemand v. Zip's Trucking Co., Inc. 552 So. 2d 1023 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    See Arata v. Orleans Capitol Stores, Inc., , (1951); (La.App.
  • Breshers v. DOTD, State of La. 536 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    (1951); White v. City of Alexandria, 216 La.
  • Carter v. City of Houma 536 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    They further argue that Wickes' employees or invitees caused the crack in the cover and should thus be *577 liable, , (1951).
  • Distinguished George v. Western Auto Supply Co., Inc. 527 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    (1951); Lowe v. Thermal Supply of Shreveport, Inc., (La.App.
  • Kitchen v. Malvon Construction Co. 520 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    Arata v. Orleans Capitol Stores, [ , (1951) ] supra; cf. Nessen v. City of New Orleans, 134 La.
  • Jones v. Gillen 504 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
    App. 3 Cir.1973), , (1951), involved injuries occurring on defective sidewalks abutting the respective defendant's property.
  • Garcia on Behalf of Garcia v. Jennings 427 So. 2d 1329 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • Oliver v. Parish of Jefferson 408 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    Arata v. Orleans Capital Stores, [ , ] supra; cf. Nessen v. City of New Orleans, 134 La.
  • Skinner v. Nightingale 377 So. 2d 1348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    (1951); White v. City of Alexandria, 216 La.
  • Dufrene v. Dixie Auto Ins. Co. 373 So. 2d 162 La. 1979
  • Lanclos v. Tomlinson 351 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    (1951) and cases cited therein; Gauthier v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
  • Pence v. Ketchum 326 So. 2d 831 La. 1976
  • Pickens v. St. Tammany Parish Police Jury 323 So. 2d 430 La. 1975
    (1951); White v. City of Alexandria, 216 La.
  • Gauthier v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 286 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
  • Skains v. Allstate Insurance 264 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    692 , ; Woods v. Cappo, et al., La.App., ; , .
  • Johnson v. Aetna Insurance 219 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
  • Breaux v. G. H. Leidenheimer Co. 204 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    425 , ; Arata v. Orleans Capitol Stores, 219 La., 1045 , ; Toppi.
  • Shadwell v. City of Alexandria 191 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    In his brief, plaintiff-appellant cites in his favor the cases of Arata v. Orleans Capitol Stores, Inc., , , and Robinson v. City of Alexandria, 174 So.
  • Martin v. City of Opelousas 185 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    308 , ; Arata v. Orleans Capitol Stores, Inc., , ; Green v. Acosta, La.App.
  • KIDER v. City of Opelousas 185 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
    308 , ; Arata v. Orleans Capital Stores, Inc., , ; Brantley v. City of Baton Rouge, La.App.
  • Colclough v. Orleans Parish School Board 166 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
    81 ; Arata v. Orleans Capitol Stores, Inc., , .
  • St. Paul v. MacKenroth 165 So. 2d 273 La. 1964
  • Ford v. City of Shreveport 165 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    Arata v. Orleans Capitol Stores, Inc. et al. [219 La.1045]
  • Lee v. City of Baton Rouge 147 So. 2d 868 La. 1962
    308 , , and the many authorities cited in those matters.
  • Sepulvado v. General Fire & Casualty Company 146 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    Delahoussaye v. City of New Iberia, La.App., ; Plauche v. Consolidated Companies, Inc., 235 La.
  • Lee v. City of Baton Rouge 141 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    ( , ; Legg v. Palozzola, La.
  • Youngblood v. Newspaper Production Company 135 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
  • Robinson v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York 135 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
  • Gaspard v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Company 131 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    636 , and the cases cited therein.
  • Rogers v. T. L. James & Co., Inc. 128 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    nce in his petition and * * * therefore such petition cannot be dismissed upon an *832 exception of no cause of action unless its allegations affirmatively establish that the damage, resulted from such contributory negligence and 'exclude every reasonable hypothesis other than that the proximate cause of the accident was negligence of the plaintiff (cases cited)’, , at page 242.” The allegations of the petition do not affirmatively show such relevant facts as the relative rates of speed of the p
  • Gilliam v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company 124 So. 2d 913 La. 1960
  • Gilliam v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. 119 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    Arata v. Orleans Capitol Stores, Inc., , ; Aymond v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 151 La.
  • Toppi v. Arbour 119 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    As stated in our opinion in the Brantley case, supra, citing with approval Johnson v. Sewerage and Water Board, La.App., , , the jurisprudence of this state follows the above stated general rule.
  • Bolton v. North River Insurance Company 102 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    in discussing the rule to be applied where an exception of no cause of action was filed to a petition based upon the contention the allegations affirmatively establish the contributory negligence of the plaintiff as the proximate cause of the accident, stated: "In reaching its decision the Court
  • Bergeron v. Greyhound Corporation 100 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    negligence in his petition and that therefore such petition cannot be dismissed upon an exception of no cause of action unless its allegations affirmatively establish that the damage resulted from such contributory negligence and "exclude every reasonable hypothesis other than that the proximate cause of the accident was negligence of the plaintiff (cases cited)", , at page 242.
  • Brantley v. City of Baton Rouge 98 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    "The holding in the Johnson case is in accord with the decision reached by the Supreme Court in the case of Arata v. Orleans Capital Stores [ ], , wherein it was concluded: "`In the instant case plaintiff's allegations, although vague in some respects, seem to charge the Store (the abutting owner) with having knowingly caused the undermining and breaking down of the sidewalk's foundation by maintaining an adjacent depression on its property whi
  • Brignac v. Fontenot 96 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    242: “It is also well settled, however, with respect to such issue, that inasmuch as a plaintiff is not required to negative contributory negligence in his petition the exception should not be maintained unless the alleged facts establish affirmatively the existence of negligence on his part proximatel
  • Downs v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London 90 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Probably the most recent review on this subject is Arata v. Orleans Capitol Stores, Inc., , .
  • Myers v. Traders & General Insurance Company 81 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
    81 ; Arata v. Orleans Capitol Stores, Inc., , .
  • Swank v. Jordan 71 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    1031 , ; , ; Lobell, for use and benefit of Hardware Mutual Casualty Co., v. Neal, La.App., .