DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Schnitter, 56 So. 2d 563.

16 citing documents.

  • Lane v. Lane 375 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
  • Williams v. Carter 344 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
  • Stevens v. Claiborne Company 305 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    See also Succession of Schnitter, 1951, , 56 So.
  • Succession of Thumfart 289 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    Succession of Schnitter, 1951, , , refused a marital portion to a husband earning $300 monthly; however, the husband's assets were $3,000 and the wife's only $6,200.
  • Succession of Neal 242 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
  • Liuzza v. Heirs of Nunzio 241 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
  • Succession of Evans 171 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    473 , ; , ; Cameron v. Rowland, 215 La.
  • Bailey v. Alice C. Plantation & Refinery Inc. 152 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    177, 198, 199 , (1948); , , 565 (1951); Succession of Franek, 224 La.
  • Succession of Viola 138 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    473 , ; , ; Cameron v. Rowland, 215 La.
  • Johnson v. Shreveport Transit Company 137 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
    177 , (1949); , (1952); Succession of Blades, La.App., , (4th Cir.1961).
  • Succession of Blades 127 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
    Cameron v. Rowland, 215 La.
  • Graves v. United States Rubber Company 111 So. 2d 752 La. 1959
    294 ; , ; Succession of Franek, 224 La.
  • Slater v. Culpepper 99 So. 2d 348 La. 1957
    *1081 and , .” Here, it is undisputed that all of the property possessed by Mrs. Bynum at the time of her death had been acquired during her marriage with Mr. Bynum and while their community of acquets and gains existed.
  • Succession of Hemenway 83 So. 2d 377 La. 1955
  • Guilbeau v. Guilbeau 71 So. 2d 129 La. 1954
    342 .” In the very recent case of , , this Court stated: “This act of sale did not recite that the purchase price was paid with her separate funds, and the presumption under Article 2402 of our Civil Code is that it belonged to the community.
  • Succession of Le Jeune 59 So. 2d 446 La. 1952