DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Alonso v. Bowers, 64 So. 2d 443.

40 citing documents.

  • H. Edward Sherman v. Old Point Bar, Point Investment Company, Inc., Warren P. Munster, Jr., Dale Edward Triguero, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
  • Camille Landry v. Pediatric Services of America, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    art. 2004, Official Comment (b); So.2d 443 (1953); Succession of Gilmore, 157 La.
  • Duckworth Properties, L.L.C. v. Williams 52 So. 3d 287 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
  • Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light 951 So. 2d 1058 La. 2007
  • Power Marketing Direct, Inc. v. Foster 938 So. 2d 662 La. 2006
  • Ainsworth v. Ainsworth 860 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    However, , (1953) it is stated: * * * The courts have looked at each case from a purely equitable viewpoint to ascertain whether allowing the judgment to stand would be inequitable or unconscionable in view of the practice or procedure which enabled the party to obtain such judgment.
  • Collins v. Estrade 638 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    art. 2004, Official Comment *279 (b); , (1953); Succession of Gilmore, 157 La.
  • Butler v. Reeder 632 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    art. 2004, , : Under the jurisprudence any improper practice or procedure which enables a party to obtain a definitive judgment comes within the meaning of this article.
  • Gardebled v. Georgia Pacific Corp. 506 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    If he does not so respond, summary judgment, if appropriate, shall be rendered against him.” *579 , (1953) the Louisiana Supreme Court, in an opinion written by the noted civilian scholar Justice Hawthorne, stated: “No notice of the default judgment was served on either Alonso or his counsel, and neither of them had any knowledge of the judgment until more than a year after the date of its rendition
  • State v. Beauchamp 473 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    art. 2004), [2] , (1953): Under the jurisprudence any improper practice or procedure which enables a party to obtain a definitive judgment comes within the meaning of this article.
  • Bush v. Lee 443 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
    1093 , : `Under the jurisprudence any improper practice or procedure which enables a party to obtain a definitive judgment comes within the meaning of this article.
  • Kem Search, Inc. v. Sheffield 434 So. 2d 1067 La. 1983
    art. 2004, Official Comment (b); , (1953); Succession of Gilmore, 157 La.
  • Gramm v. Brock 430 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • Williams v. New York Fire & Marine Insurance 427 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    94 (1924): “The courts of this state will not hesitate to afford relief against judgments, irrespective of any issue of inattention or neglect, when the circumstances under which the judgment is rendered show that deprivation of legal rights of the litigant who seeks relief, and when the enforcement of the judgment would be unconscientious and inequitable.” , (1953), the court stated the proposition as follows: “...
  • West v. Gajdzik 425 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    art. 2004, [1] , : "Under the jurisprudence any improper practice or procedure which enables a party to obtain a definitive judgment comes within the meaning of this article.
  • Gladstone v. American Auto. Ass'n, Inc. 419 So. 2d 1219 La. 1982
  • Albert v. Lirette 394 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
  • Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc. 392 So. 2d 398 La. 1980
    1093 , : "Under the jurisprudence any improper practice or procedure which enables a party to obtain a definitive judgment comes within the meaning of this article.
  • Plantation Acceptance Corp. v. Stone 379 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
  • Succession of Skye 364 So. 2d 1357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
  • Collins v. Collins 325 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
    Official Revision Comment (b); , (1953); (La.App.
  • Jones v. Decuers 320 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    However, , (1953) it is stated: "* * * The courts have looked at each case from a purely equitable viewpoint to ascertain whether allowing the judgment to stand would be inequitable or unconscionable in view of the practice or procedure which enabled the party to obtain such judgment.
  • Johnston v. Smith 284 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
    See, also: , (1953); Hall v. Hall, supra
  • Licoho Enterprises, Inc. v. Succession of Champagne 270 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    542 .’ , (1953); First Nat.
  • Muller v. Michel Lecler Inc. 266 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
    App. 2nd Cir. 1961); , (1953); and Bell v. Holdcraft, 196 So.
  • Chaney v. Scott 261 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    (1953), wherein plaintiff sought the nullity of a *360 default judgment obtained against him by defendant.
  • Estelle J. Wilson Mortuary, Inc. v. Waker 244 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    842, ; , ; Succession of Gilmore, 157 La.
  • Sterling v. Jones 233 So. 2d 537 La. 1970
    94 (1924) ; , (1953), and cases there cited.
  • Southern Discount Company v. Williams 226 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
    art. 2004 our Supreme Court has said, , (1953), "* * * Under the jurisprudence any improper practice or procedure which enables a party to obtain a definitive judgment comes within the meaning of this article.
  • Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Martens 192 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
    542 .” , (1953); First Nat.
  • Leidig v. Leidig 187 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
  • Pontchartrain Park Homes, Inc. v. Sewerage & Water Board 168 So. 2d 595 La. 1964
    94 , , , Tapp v. Guaranty Finance Company, Inc., La.App., , and particularly by reason of Article 2004 of the Code of Civil Procedure which reads as follows: “A final judgment obtained by fraud or ill practices may be annulled.
  • Dare v. Myrick 168 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
    1099 , (1949); , (1953); Coltraro v. Chotin, 1 La.App.
  • Tapp v. Guaranty Finance Company 158 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    the Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the district court which declared the nullity of a judgment rendered on open account.
  • Pfeiffer v. Hemisphere International Corporation 153 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
    art. 1973; , ; Succession of Gilmore, 157 La.
  • Lee v. Carroll 146 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    870 ; see also: , ; Hall v. Hall, La.App., 127 So.
  • Lewis v. Bell 137 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    94 ; Alonso v. Bowers, [ ] ; and, Mattie Mae Cole Wilkinson v. Ben Wilkinson, [La.App.]
  • Scruggs v. Butler Furniture Co. 104 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
  • Vegas v. Cheramie 80 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    in which an appeal was taken from a judgment annulling and setting aside a previous judgment.
  • Meyer v. Esteb 75 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    This is evident by the exception made in the statute, that portion of the section which reads: “ * * * but no service need be made on parties in default for 'failure to appear except pleadings asserting new or additional claims for relief against them.” , , cited and relied upon by defendant, appellant, is not apposite here because the pleading involved was an amended petition, in which the amount claimed and sued for was increased and the plaintiff in that case was asserting_a new or an additio