DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hill v. Richey, 59 So. 2d 434.

124 citing documents.

  • Ryan v. Pekinto 387 So. 2d 1325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    3437, 3498, 3499; Ward v. Standard Materials Incorporated, supra; Manson Realty Company v. Plaisance, supra; , (1952).
  • Ryan v. Pekinto 387 So. 2d 1325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    3437, 3498, 3499; Ward v. Standard Materials Incorporated, supra; Manson Realty Company v. Plaisance, supra; , (1952).
  • Ferguson v. Gunther 385 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
    The clearing of Lot 6 in this instance to the lot line projected visibly between the subdivision corner stakes is similar in legal effect to the blazing of a line in the woods, , (1952), and to the cutting of timber, (La.App.
  • Harper v. Willis 383 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
  • August v. Hamilton 381 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Roy O. Martin Lumber Co., Inc. v. Lemoine 381 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    Art. 3661; , Rhodes v. Collier, 215 La.
  • City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal 378 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
  • Plaisance v. Collins 365 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
  • Bd. of Com'rs. Etc. v. Hunter Foundation 354 So. 2d 156 La. 1977
  • Holliday v. Continental Can Co., Inc. 351 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
  • Wagley v. Cross 347 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    In William T. Burton Industries, Inc. v. Cook, supra, , (1952).
  • Harris v. Galloway 348 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
  • Bradford v. Thomas 344 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
    3442-44, 3502; , (1952).
  • Gaulter v. Gennaro 345 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
  • Mustiful v. Galaspy 340 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 3660; , (1952); (La.App.
  • Norton v. Addie 337 So. 2d 432 La. 1976
  • Olinkraft, Incorporated v. Allen 333 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
    (1952) thus: What the court means by "enclosures', as that term is used in the numerous cases found in the jurisprudence, is that the land actually, physically, and corporeally possessed by one as owner must be established with certainty, whether by natural or by artificial marks; that is, that they mus
  • William T. Burton Industries, Inc. v. Cook 322 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    (1952) the issue was whether the plaintiff had the requisite possession to bring the possessory action.
  • Johnson v. La Bokay Corporation 326 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    1 Cir. 1959); , (1952); (La.App.
  • Ryder v. Lacour 322 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
  • Liner v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co. 303 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
  • Thevenet v. Clause 302 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    art. 3658; , (1952); (La.App.
  • Antulovich v. Whitley 289 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
  • Harvey v. Havard 287 So. 2d 780 La. 1973
    Wright v. Holder, La.App.
  • Pure Oil Company v. Skinner 284 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
    (1952); John T. Moore Planting Co. v. Morgan's Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. Co., 126 La.
  • Martin v. Garlotte 285 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
  • Martin v. Howell 280 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
  • Prothro v. City of Natchitoches 265 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    Labarre v. Rateau, 210 La.
  • Clampitt v. Davis Brothers Lumber Co. 266 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
  • Richard v. Comeaux 260 So. 2d 350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    In supporting the plaintiffs' demand, , (1952).
  • Theriot v. LA-TERRE COMPANY 256 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    (1952) the court defined the type of proof which a plaintiff must offer in order to establish the requisite possession under the possessory action.
  • Jastremski v. Robichaux 255 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    149 , 258 (1952); , 441 (1952).
  • Delatte v. Petit 252 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    Art. 3437; , ; Thompson’s Succession v. Cyprian, La.App.
  • Bagby v. Clause 251 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    ve of the conditions and requirements necessary to meet the tests of a ten year acquisitive prescriptive title, and further, that the trial court, while not deciding the case on the basis of a thirty year prescriptive title, noted that the evidence adduced by the defendants was sufficient to adjudge that defendants had acquired a , .
  • Bihm v. Voorhies 241 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    (1952), the following can be found: “What the court means by ‘enclosures’, as that term is used in the numerous cases found in the jurisprudence, is that the land actually, physically, and corporeally possessed by one as owner must be established with certainty, whether by natural or by artificial marks
  • Souther v. Domingue 238 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
  • Louisiana Materials Co. v. Cronvich 236 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
  • Jones v. Pringle 226 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    il Procedure provides : “A person is in possession of immovable property or of a real right, within the intendment of the articles of this Chapter, when he has the corporeal possession thereof, or civil possession thereof preceded by corporeal possession by him or his ancestors in title, and possesses for himself, whether in good or bad faith, or even as a usurper.” , (1952), decided prior to the adoption of the present Code of Civil Procedure, the Supreme Court interpreted the requirements of p
  • Clark v. Lee 221 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    Thus, in the prescription of thirty years, which is acquired without title, it extends only to that which has been actually possessed by the person pleading it.” Beginning with the case of Prevost’s Heirs v. Johnson, 9 Mart, O.S., 123, 174 (1820), , (1952), the Supreme Court recognized the rule prevailing in our jurisprudence that when a person claims by possession alone without showing any title, he must show an adverse possession by enclosures, and his claim will not extend beyond such enclosu
  • Vavoline Oil Co. v. Concordia Parish School Board 216 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
    we note and cite with approval the following applicable language of our State Supreme Court: "`What the court means by "enclosures", as that term is used in the numerous cases found in the jurisprudence, is that the land actually, physically, and corporeally possessed by one as owner must be establish
  • Champagne v. La-Terre Co. 201 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Hill v. Richey, et al., , and cases cited therein.
  • P. M. Realty Co. v. Devitt 199 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
  • L-M Co. v. Blanchard 197 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Some person has had charge of the property for plaintiffs, with full supervision thereof, and authority to lease, police, and generally take care of the property for at least 25 years prior to the institution of this lawsuit In evaluating the possession of plaintiffs, the trial judge applied the stand *182 , (1952), which requires that the nature of the possession requisite for the possessory action of one claiming without title is the same as that of the possession upon which is based the presc
  • Chauvin v. Kirchhoff 194 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Broussard v. Motty, La.App., ; , ; Broussard v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co. et al., .
  • Kilchrist v. Conrad 191 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
    Articles 3499-3505; Hill v. Richey, et al., , ; ; (La.App.
  • Martin Timber Company v. Taylor 187 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
    567 ; ABA Exploration Gas & Oil Company v. A. Wilbert's & Sons Lumber & Shingle Company, La.App., ; , .
  • Broussard v. Motty 174 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
    Hill v. Richey, et al., , ; Broussard v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Company, et al., La.App.
  • A. B. A. Exploration Gas & Oil Co. v. A. Wilbert's Sons Lumber & Shingle Co. 170 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
    Articles 3501, 3502; Hill v. Richey, et al., , .
  • Broussard v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co. 164 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    Buckley v. Dumond, 156 So.
  • Broussard v. Wisner 164 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    Buckley v. Dumond, 156 So.