Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Randall, 53 So. 2d 689.

25 citing documents.

East New Orleans Neighborhood Advisory Commission v. Levy Gardens Partners 2008, LLC 20 So. 3d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
(“where a statute is ambiguous and susceptible to two constructions, the courts will give that construction which best comports with the principles of reason, justice, and convenience, for it is presumed that the Legislature intended such exceptions to its language as would avoid its lead
Bd. of Trust. of State Empl. v. St. Landry 844 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Hoag v. State Ex Rel. Kennedy 836 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Bebop's Ice House, Inc. v. City of Sulphur 774 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Rushing v. City of Baton Rouge 696 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Caulfield v. Leonard 676 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Melancon 677 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Crawford 672 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
the court explained: Admittedly the statute does not expressly repeal the mentioned codal provisions; hence, the question is whether or not it repeals them by implication.
January v. January 649 So. 2d 1133 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
(1951) and State v. Standard Oil, 188 La.
State v. Craig 637 So. 2d 437 La. 1994
Thomas v. Highlands Ins. Co. 617 So. 2d 877 La. 1993
Touchard v. Williams 617 So. 2d 885 La. 1993
Hayden v. Richland Parish School Bd. 554 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
840 , (1960); , (1951); (La.
Phillips v. Phillips 467 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
[(1951)]: `In interpreting these codal provisions this court has held on numerous occasions that the right to contest the legitimacy of a child born during marriage is strictly personal to the husband and can be exercised by him only during a fixed period (with the right *135 reserved to his heirs in th
State v. Manning 390 So. 2d 494 La. 1980
State v. Monk 351 So. 2d 125 La. 1977
242 , 142 So.2d *128 410 (1962); , (1951), rather than a construction which would make the statute meaningless.
Gulf Oil Corporation v. State Mineral Board 317 So. 2d 576 La. 1975
Taylor v. Taylor 295 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
For instance, , (1951) the court said: "In interpreting these codal provisions this court has held on numerous occasions that the right to contest the legitimacy of a child born during marriage is strictly personal to the husband and can be exercised by him only during a fixed period (with the right reserved to his hei
Burrell v. Burrell 154 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
: "In interpreting these codal provisions this court has held on numerous occasions that the right to contest the legitimacy of a child born during marriage is strictly personal to the husband and can be exercised by him only during a fixed period (with the right reserved to his heirs in the event of hi
State v. Hubbard 81 So. 2d 844 La. 1955
4 , ; State v. Jones, 220 La.
State v. Lemoine 69 So. 2d 15 La. 1953
Our decision in State v. Randall, 1951, , , supports the ruling of which the State complains and is decisive of this'appeal.
State ex rel. Grosch v. Echezabal 58 So. 2d 398 La. 1952
State v. Sims 57 So. 2d 177 La. 1952
381 , , , and discussion of other grounds for reversal urged by appellant’s counsel would be superfluous.
State v. Jones 56 So. 2d 724 La. 1951
State v. Jones 56 So. 2d 724 La. 1951