DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Guillory v. Guillory, 59 So. 2d 424.

46 citing documents.

  • Gathen v. Gathen 66 So. 3d 1 La. 2011
    603 , (1955); , (1952)).
  • Bergeron v. Bergeron 492 So. 2d 1193 La. 1986
    784 , (1953); , (1952); State ex rel Divens v. Johnson, 207 La.
  • Parrish v. Parrish 448 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    871 , (1946); , (1952); (La.App.
  • Guidry v. Guidry 441 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
    603 ] Guillory v. Guillory, [ ] "
  • Burch v. Burch 398 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    App. 4th Cir. 1980); , (1952); (La.App.
  • Montgomery v. Montgomery 383 So. 2d 1384 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
  • Heymann v. Lewis 414 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    603 , (1955); , (1952); (La.App.
  • Schlegel v. Schlegel 375 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    691 , ; Decker v. Landry, supra, note 2 ; , .
  • Hays v. Hays 365 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    603 , (1955); , (1952); (La.App.
  • State Ex Rel. Killman v. Gurley 354 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    603 , (1955); Guillory v. Guillory, *758 , (1952); (citing numerous court of appeal decisions to such effect).
  • Bushnell v. Bushnell 348 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    603 , (1955); , (1952); (La.App.
  • Schramm v. Simpson 343 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    603 , (1955); , (1952); (citing numerous court of appeal decisions to such effect).
  • Stevens v. Stevens 340 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    603 , (1955); , (1952); (La.App.
  • Acosta v. Acosta 334 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
  • Fontenot v. Fontenot 327 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
  • Caraway v. Caraway 321 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    603 , (1955); , (1952); (La.App.
  • Welch v. Welch 307 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    (1952); "[T]he courts have consistently held that the right of the mother to the custody of the minor child is paramount to that of the father, unless, in his discretion, the trial judge concludes it is for the greater advantage of the child that it be entrusted to the care of the father, which conclusi
  • Whitfield v. Whitfield 295 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    603 , (1955); , (1952); (citing numerous court of appeal decisions to such effect) .
  • Earnest v. Earnest 286 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    603 , (1955); , (1952)."
  • Stuckey v. Stuckey 276 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
    603 , (1955); , (1952)."
  • Malbrough v. Malbrough 267 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    LeBreton v. LeBlanc, La.App., .
  • Rayner v. Rayner 263 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
  • Griffith v. Roy 256 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    485 , (1953); , (1952) ; Cannon v. Cannon, 225 La.
  • Hebert v. Hebert 255 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
  • Fulco v. Fulco 254 So. 2d 603 La. 1971
    374 , (1952) ; (citing numerous court of appeal decisions to such effect).
  • Fulco v. Fulco 245 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    252 , 122 So,2d 90 (1960); , (1952) ; and LeBlanc v. LeBlanc, supra.” [ ] In Tuggle v. Tuggle, La.App., 235 So.
  • Pellegrin v. Friedley 237 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    and his exercise of that discretion will not be disturbed in the absence of a clear abuse thereof.
  • Nugent v. Nugent 232 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
    252 , (1960); , (1952); and LeBlanc v. LeBlanc, supra.
  • Jackson v. Jackson 217 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    252 , (1960); , (1952); Ard v. Ard, 210 La.
  • Robertson v. Robertson 215 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
  • Tiffee v. Tiffee 212 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    1st Cir. 1963); , (1952); Sampognaro v. Sampognaro, 222 La.
  • LeBlanc v. LeBlanc 194 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    485 , (1953); , (1952); Sampognaro v. Sampognaro, 215 La.
  • Murtishaw v. Brady 191 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1966
    967 , ; , ; State ex rel.
  • Poole v. Poole 189 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    869 , ; , ; Hathorn v. Hathorn, 237 La.
  • Schilling v. White 180 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    151 , (1952); , (1952); State ex rel.
  • State v. Toole 173 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
  • West v. West 170 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
    151 , (1952); , (1952); Sampognaro v. Sampognaro, 215 La.
  • Morris v. Morris 152 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    869 , ; , ; Hathorn v. Hathorn, 237 La.
  • Stevens v. Stevens 147 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
  • Kaufman v. Kaufman 146 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    the Supreme Court said that "in awarding the custody of the child a large discretion is left to the trial judge, which, of course, is subject to review."
  • Ballard v. Ballard 135 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    factually is strikingly similar to the issues presented on this appeal.
  • State ex rel. Hebert v. Knight 135 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    151 , ; , ; Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, 232 La.
  • Byrd v. Byrd 128 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
  • Messner v. Messner 122 So. 2d 90 La. 1960
    Plaintiff urges that the facts of the instant case are comparable to those in Kieffer v. Heriard, supra; , , in which this Court upheld the district judge in depriving the mother of the custody of her children because of her moral unfitness and misconduct.
  • Drouin v. Hildenbrand 105 So. 2d 532 La. 1958
    The principles of law appropriate to this cause, which are not disputed by the parties, , .
  • State ex rel. Magliore v. Saragusa 87 So. 2d 309 La. 1956
    425: “A mother is entitled to the custody of her child unless it be shown that she is morally unfit or that it would be a greater advantage to award its custody to its father.