Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Nalty v. Nalty, 64 So. 2d 216.

23 citing documents.

Thomas v. Thomas 246 So. 3d 736 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
In Nalty v. Nalty , , (1953), the Louisiana Supreme Court considered an argument that a case should not have been reopened based upon Art. 484, and stated, "The decisions of our courts have been written into this article, and now the reopening of a case is left to the discretion of the trial judge."
State of Louisiana v. Demetrius D. Nash La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Nash 112 So. 3d 409 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 1/11/11), (“Armed robbery is a most serious crime and should be dealt with very sternly.”), writ denied, 11-306 (La.6/24/11), .
William T. Burton Industries, Inc. v. Monk 372 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Ponder v. Pechon 274 So. 2d 386 La. 1973
The plaintiff argues, however, that the court erred in failing to give proper consideration to two other decisions of this Court, , (1953) and Twomey v. Papalia, 142 La.
Urban Management Corp. v. Ford Motor Credit Co. 263 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
LSA-Code of Civil Procedure Articles 1631 and 1632 (See Comment (b) under Article 1632); , (1953); Dupre v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, (La.
Poche v. Frazier 232 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
art. 1632; Dupre v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, La.App., ; , ; Succession of Lefort, 139 La.
American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp. v. Alongio 169 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
“Art. 1631, supra, permits a liberal interpretation of the Robinson case.” , (1953) the trial judge allowed the reopening of the case for a physician to give additional testimony.
Scheppegrell v. Barth 117 So. 2d 903 La. 1960
1083 , ; , ; Rosenthal v. Gauthier, 224 La.
Fouquier v. Fouquier 91 So. 2d 591 La. 1956
341 , ; , ; Moser v. Moser, 220 La.
Second Church of Christ, Scientist v. Spencer 88 So. 2d 810 La. 1956
1083 , ; , ; Rosenthal v. Gauthier, 224 La.
Southwest Gas Producing Co. v. Hattie Brothers 88 So. 2d 649 La. 1956
Rosenthal v. Gauthier, 224 La.
Followed Barrett Division of Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Kennedy Saw Mills, Inc. 88 So. 2d 5 La. 1956
Rosenthal v. Gauthier, 224 La.
Allison v. Pick 86 So. 2d 179 La. 1956
Rosenthal v. Gauthier, 224 La.
Holmes Company v. Foret 86 So. 2d 66 La. 1956
456 , ; , ; Rosenthal v. Gauthier, 224 La.
Holmes Co. v. Foret 86 So. 2d 66 La. 1956
456 , ; , ; Rosenthal v. Gauthier, 224 La.
Allison v. Pick 86 So. 2d 179 La. 1956
Rosenthal v. Gauthier, 224 La.
Succession of Gaines 79 So. 2d 322 La. 1955
341 , ; , ; Moser v. Moser, 220 La.
Moore v. Lelong 77 So. 2d 729 La. 1955
Davis v. Lewis & Lewis 78 So. 2d 174 La. 1954
341 , ; , ; Roach v. Roach, 213 La.
Olivier v. Abunza 76 So. 2d 528 La. 1954
341 , ; , ; Moser v. Moser, 220 La.
Carpenter v. Skinner 71 So. 2d 133 La. 1954
295 , ; , ; Rosenthal v. Gauthier, 224 La.
Rosenthal v. Gauthier 69 So. 2d 367 La. 1953

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by