Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Miller v. Miller, 76 So. 2d 3.

19 citing documents.

Curtis Tezeno v. Daniel Robert Young La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
There must be a reasonable amount of probative evidence to fortify a finding of fact.” So.2d 3,4 (1954).
Ellis v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. 550 So. 2d 1310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Tippett v. Maryland Casualty Co. 536 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Accord, , (1954.)” (Footnotes omitted.)
Hogan v. McKeithen 527 So. 2d 982 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Mart v. Hill 505 So. 2d 1120 La. 1987
Kikendall v. American Progressive Ins. Co. 457 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Whittington v. Sowela Technical Institute 438 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
(1954); Heap v. Newark Ins.
Board of Com'rs v. Louisiana Com'n on Ethics 416 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
[12] Miller *239 v. Miller, , (1954); (La.App.
Frazier v. Green Steel Bldg., Inc. 409 So. 2d 1290 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Baker v. Life General SEC. Ins. Co. 405 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Reed v. Thomas 355 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
Foster v. Allstate Insurance 277 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
In support of this position, , (1954) and 20 Am.Jur., Evidence, Section 608.
Pacholik v. Gray 187 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
rejecting as hearsay declarations of a decedent sought to be introduced by his heirs.
Spiers v. Davidson 135 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Heap v. Newark Insurance Co. 129 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
White v. Johness 112 So. 2d 717 La. 1959
Spiers v. Davidson 96 So. 2d 502 La. 1957
Succession of Rockwood 91 So. 2d 779 La. 1956
Bickham v. Wax Lumber Co. 84 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
wherein the Supreme Court stated that “the only declarations by a person since deceased, which are admissible as exceptions to the hearsay rule, are dying declarations, statements against interest and in rare instances pertaining to family history, relationship and pedigree, where they are received a