DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wilson v. Calvin, 59 So. 2d 451.

13 citing documents.

  • Amanda Cousin Versus Michael Cousin La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
    1982); So.2d 451 (1952); Walsh v. Walsh, 215 La.
  • Short v. Short 912 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    While our resolution of the question presented herein is not based on any policy considerations, , (1952), that: [t]here is a strong public policy against disturbing a judgment of divorce, especially after a long period of time where the marital status of innocent parties who relied on the validity of that judgment would be disturbed, and more particularly where a decree would render *86 innocen
  • Hemavathy v. Shivashankara 782 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    (1952); Walsh v. Walsh, 215 La.
  • Bernard v. Bernard 648 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    (1952): There is a strong public policy against disturbing or declaring invalid a judgment of divorce, especially after a long period of time where the marital status of innocent parties who relied on the validity of that judgment would be disturbed, and more particularly where a decree would rende
  • Succession of Cohen 480 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    While we recognize the strong policy in our state against recognition of foreign “quickie divorces”, we also note the equally strong policy against declaring divorces invalid, especially where to do so would cast over innocent parties and their children the clouds of bigamy and illigitimacy, , (1952).
  • Clay v. Clay 467 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    We do observe, however, , (1952), that: "There is a strong public policy against disturbing or declaring invalid a judgment of divorce, especially after a long period of time where the marital status of innocent parties who relied on the validity of that judgment would be disturbed, and more particularly where a decree would ren
  • Pierce v. Gervais 425 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    (1952) said: There is a strong public policy against disturbing or declaring invalid a judgment of divorce, especially after a long period of time where the marital status of innocent parties who relied on the validity of that judgment would be disturbed, and more particularly where a decree would rende
  • Peschier v. Peschier 419 So. 2d 923 La. 1982
    (1952); Walsh v. Walsh, 215 La.
  • Call v. Call 274 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
    Insofar as the exceptions of no cause of action are concerned, , , handed down by the Supreme Court of Louisiana in 1952, is controlling and requires that we affirm the judgment maintaining those exceptions.
  • Tannehill v. Tannehill 226 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
  • Barr v. Freeman 175 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
    at page 453: “There is a strong public policy against disturbing or declaring invalid a judgment of divorce, especially after a long period of time where the marital status of innocent parties who relied on the validity of that judgment would be disturbed, and more particularly where .
  • Pontchartrain Park Homes, Inc. v. Sewerage & Water Board 168 So. 2d 595 La. 1964
  • Dupuis v. Patin 155 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963